IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v62y2023i1p1-15.html

Collaboration in Publication: Can We Practice What We Preach?

Author

Listed:
  • Yao “Henry” Jin
  • David Swanson
  • Bryan Ashenbaum

Abstract

As editors it is our intent to continually improve the quality of both published articles for our readers and reviews received by our authors here at Transportation Journal. With that purpose in mind, this article seeks to draw parallels between the editorial review process and supply chain collaboration, helping us practice what we teach. Importantly, the review process is intended to co‐create value among authors and reviewers under the guidance of the editors. While Transportation Journal already has a core group of scholars who excel in both roles as authors and reviewers, our goal is for this editorial to serve as a guide for our extended network of contributors to adopt an enhanced, collaborative approach. In doing so, we believe that the intended results will ultimately lead us toward production process that is at an even higher quality to generate even greater value for the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao “Henry” Jin & David Swanson & Bryan Ashenbaum, 2023. "Collaboration in Publication: Can We Practice What We Preach?," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:62:y:2023:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerardo Patriotta, 2017. "Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 747-759, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2020. "The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s Argument for Integrative Reviews," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1290-1304, September.
    2. Bastian, Bob & Zucchella, Antonella, 2023. "Nascent entrepreneurs during start-up competitions: Between beauty contests and co-created problematization," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    3. Sorin M. S. Krammer & Peter Dahlin & Jonathan P. Doh & Kristina Potočnik, 2024. "Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1654-1682, June.
    4. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    5. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Maksim Belitski & Christian Fisch & Roy Thurik, 2024. "What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1139-1170, October.
    6. Kimberly D. Elsbach & Daan van Knippenberg, 2020. "Creating High‐Impact Literature Reviews: An Argument for ‘Integrative Reviews’," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1277-1289, September.
    7. Jörgen Sandberg & Mats Alvesson, 2021. "Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 487-516, March.
    8. Christina Hoon & Alina M. Baluch, 2020. "The Role of Dialectical Interrogation in Review Studies: Theorizing from What We See Rather Than What We Have Already Seen," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1246-1271, September.
    9. Meglio, Olimpia, 2022. "Reshaping M&A research: Strategies and tactics for a new research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 823-831.
    10. Gerardo Patriotta, 2020. "Writing Impactful Review Articles," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(6), pages 1272-1276, September.
    11. Daniel S. Lacerda & Fabio B. Meira & Vanessa Brulon, 2021. "Spatial Ethics Beyond the North–South Dichotomy: Moral Dilemmas in Favelas," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 695-707, July.
    12. Mark P. Healey & Hannes Leroy & Corinne Post & Kristina Potočnik, 2023. "Changing the Scholarly Conversation: What it Means, Why it Matters, and How to Approach it in Micro Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1633-1656, September.
    13. Marco Seeber, 2020. "How do journals of different rank instruct peer reviewers? Reviewer guidelines in the field of management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1387-1405, March.
    14. Hadi Jaber & Franck Marle & Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal & Ilkan Sarigol & Lionel Didiez, 2021. "A Framework to Evaluate Project Complexity Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-35, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:62:y:2023:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.