IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v57y2018i3p280-309.html

Evaluation of Ship Repair Services: A Case Study of Taiwan Shipping Companies' Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Hua‐An Lu
  • Yu‐Chang Hsu
  • Ching‐Wu Chu

Abstract

Ship repairers are long‐term cooperative partners of shipping lines that keep ships in a safe condition. This industry is a professional and technical enterprise. This study explores the critical factors affecting the selection of ship repairers by shipping lines. Ship repair services can be divided into repair yards and repair shops. Repair yards provide berths and dry docks for conducting repair engineering, while repair shops actually perform the ship repairs. Through an investigation of experts, two analysis hierarchies for yards and shops based on a fuzzy multicriteria decision‐making (FMCDM) approach are proposed and applied to evaluate the repair services across the Taiwan Strait. The most important criteria in the analyses are repairers' offer terms, relative costs of the service, and technique performance as well as the arrangement of the repair period. Chinese repair yards have attracted shipping lines because of their advantages with respect to costs and productive facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua‐An Lu & Yu‐Chang Hsu & Ching‐Wu Chu, 2018. "Evaluation of Ship Repair Services: A Case Study of Taiwan Shipping Companies' Selection," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 280-309, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:3:p:280-309
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.57.3.0280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.57.3.0280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.57.3.0280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Talluri, Srinivas & Narasimhan, Ram, 2003. "Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max-min approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 543-552, May.
    2. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R. & Benton, W. C., 1991. "Vendor selection criteria and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 2-18, January.
    3. Boa Zhang Lu & Alan S. T. Tang, 2000. "China shipbuilding management challenges in the 1980s," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 71-78.
    4. Chia-Chan Chou & Pao-Long Chang, 2004. "Core competence and competitive strategy of the Taiwan shipbuilding industry: a resource-based approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 125-137, April.
    5. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    6. Yu-Chang Hsu & Hua-An Lu & Ching-Wu Chu, 2016. "Evaluating and selecting maritime suppliers," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 39-58, January.
    7. Lee, Jae Kyu & Lee, Kyoung Jun & Park, Hung Kook & Hong, June Seok & Lee, Jung Seung, 1997. "Developing scheduling systems for Daewoo Shipbuilding: DAS project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 380-395, March.
    8. Ng, Wan Lung, 2008. "An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(3), pages 1059-1067, May.
    9. Wu, Desheng Dash & Zhang, Yidong & Wu, Dexiang & Olson, David L., 2010. "Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: A possibility approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 774-787, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Cong & Li, Xueping, 2014. "A multi-echelon inventory system with supplier selection and order allocation under stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 37-47.
    2. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    3. Zeki Ayağ & Funda Samanlioglu, 2016. "An intelligent approach to supplier evaluation in automotive sector," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 889-903, August.
    4. José A. Ventura & Boaz Golany & Abraham Mendoza & Chenxi Li, 2022. "A multi-product dynamic supply chain inventory model with supplier selection, joint replenishment, and transportation cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(2), pages 729-762, September.
    5. García Alcaraz Jorge Luis & Alvarado Iniesta Alejandro & Maldonado Macías Aidé Araceli, 2013. "Selección de proveedores basada en análisis dimensional," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(3), pages 249-278, julio-sep.
    6. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    7. Feng, Bo & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Li, Yanzhi, 2011. "A decision method for supplier selection in multi-service outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 240-250, August.
    8. Ekici, Ali, 2013. "An improved model for supplier selection under capacity constraint and multiple criteria," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 574-581.
    9. Yu, Yugang & Hong, Zhaofu & Zhang, Linda L. & Liang, Liang & Chu, Chengbin, 2013. "Optimal selection of retailers for a manufacturing vendor in a vendor managed inventory system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 273-284.
    10. Longlong Ye & Guang Song & Shaohua Song, 2024. "Enhancing Economic, Resilient, and Sustainable Outcomes Through Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in the Food Manufacturing Industry: A Hybrid Delphi-FAHP-FMOP Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Jui-Fang Chang & Chao-Jung Lai & Chia-Nan Wang & Ming-Hsien Hsueh & Van Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Fuzzy Optimization Model for Decision-Making in Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    14. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Ali Salmasnia & Hamid Daliri & Ali Ghorbanian & Hadi Mokhtari, 2018. "A statistical analysis and simulation based approach to an uncertain supplier selection problem with discount option," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1250-1259, December.
    16. Faiza Hamdi & Ahmed Ghorbel & Faouzi Masmoudi & Lionel Dupont, 2018. "Optimization of a supply portfolio in the context of supply chain risk management: literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 763-788, April.
    17. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    18. Pınar Kaya Samut, 2017. "Integrated FANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 427-450, May.
    19. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    20. Ehsan Afshar Bakeshlou & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh & Mohammad Ali Goudarzian Asl & Javad Sadeghi & Mostafa Abbaszadeh, 2017. "Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 913-927, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:3:p:280-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.