IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v8y2000i3p146-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should monitoring be compulsory within voluntary environmental agreements?

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Walton

    (University of Sunderland, UK)

Abstract

The emerging concept of business accountability implies a duty to demonstrate responsibility to stakeholders. Signing a voluntary environmental agreement is a method of pledging commitment; however, few voluntary environmental agreements contain monitoring mechanisms to demonstrate performance against that commitment. Some voluntary environmental agreements in the industry and business sector incorporate monitoring mechanisms and these are examined in order to discover lessons that can be learned. A monitoring mechanism, such as Environmental Reporting via hardcopy and the World Wide Web provides a useful and flexible mechanism that could be utilized to a much greater extent within other sectors. Higher education sector agreements such as the European COPERNICUS Charter and the global Talloires Declaration in particular are assessed using survey evidence to demonstrate the need for additional stimuli to ensure commitment. Flexible and incremental monitoring and reporting via a variety of cost effective communication media could provide the way forward in terms of establishing both credibility and sustainability of the voluntary environmental agreement mechanism. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Walton, 2000. "Should monitoring be compulsory within voluntary environmental agreements?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(3), pages 146-154.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:8:y:2000:i:3:p:146-154
    DOI: 10.1002/1099-1719(200008)8:3<146::AID-SD144>3.0.CO;2-R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Azzone & Raffaella Manzini & Giuliano Noci, 1996. "Evolutionary Trends In Environmental Reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 219-230, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neeraj Singhal & Preeti Suryawanshi & Garima Mittal, 2017. "Crafting Responsible Management Practices in Business School Learning Outcomes: An Indian Case Study," Vision, , vol. 21(1), pages 46-62, March.
    2. Norah Mackendrick, 2005. "The role of the state in voluntary environmental reform: A case study of public land," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 38(1), pages 21-44, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anselm Schneider & Erika Meins, 2012. "Two Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability Assessment: Towards a Comprehensive Framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 211-222, May.
    2. Jyrki Niskanen & Terhi Nieminen, 2001. "The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 29-37, January.
    3. Giuliano Noci, 2000. "Environmental reporting in Italy: current practice and future developments," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 211-223, July.
    4. Otto Andersen, 2003. "Environmental reporting and transport – the case of a public transport company," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 386-399, November.
    5. M. R. Mathews, 2001. "Some thoughts on social and environmental accounting education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 335-352.
    6. Güler Aras & David Crowther, 2009. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Study in Disingenuity?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 279-288, April.
    7. Irene Pollach, 2014. "Corporate Environmental Reporting and News Coverage of Environmental Issues: an Agenda‐Setting Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 349-360, July.
    8. Eugenio D'Amico & Daniela Coluccia & Stefano Fontana & Silvia Solimene, 2016. "Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 178-192, March.
    9. Matthias S. Fifka, 2013. "Corporate Responsibility Reporting and its Determinants in Comparative Perspective – a Review of the Empirical Literature and a Meta‐analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-35, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:8:y:2000:i:3:p:146-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.