IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v34y2014i10p1894-1906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sense and Avoid Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Using a Target Level of Safety Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Melnyk
  • Daniel Schrage
  • Vitali Volovoi
  • Hernando Jimenez

Abstract

One of the most critical challenges to full integration of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System (NAS) is the requirement to comply with CFR 14 Part 91.113 to “see and avoid” other aircraft. Various attempts have been made to develop systems to “sense and avoid” other aircraft so UAS can comply with the intent of the regulation. This article proposes a framework to develop effectiveness requirements for any SAA system by linking UAS characteristics and operating environments to midair collision risk quantified by a fatality rate. The framework consists of a target level of safety (TLS) approach using an event tree format. Safety has been identified as the most important consideration in the UAS integration process. While safety can be defined in many ways, the authors propose using a fatality rate metric that follows other statistics used in the industry. This metric allows for the use of a TLS approach to the development of SAA requirements for system certification. Failure to adequately link system requirements to safety could result in the implementation of SAA systems that either do not adequately mitigate the risk associated with UAS operations or are overdesigned, resulting in increased cost and complexity. This article demonstrates the use of the proposed framework to develop specific SAA effectiveness standards based on UAS weight and airspace class combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Melnyk & Daniel Schrage & Vitali Volovoi & Hernando Jimenez, 2014. "Sense and Avoid Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Using a Target Level of Safety Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(10), pages 1894-1906, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:10:p:1894-1906
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melnyk, Richard & Schrage, Daniel & Volovoi, Vitali & Jimenez, Hernando, 2014. "A third-party casualty risk model for unmanned aircraft system operations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 105-116.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anders la Cour‐Harbo & Henrik Schiøler, 2019. "Probability of Low‐Altitude Midair Collision Between General Aviation and Unmanned Aircraft," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2499-2513, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blom, Henk A.P. & Jiang, Chenpeng & Grimme, Wouter B.A. & Mitici, Mihaela & Cheung, Yuk S., 2021. "Third party risk modelling of Unmanned Aircraft System operations, with application to parcel delivery service," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Hongbo He & Xiaohan Liao & Huping Ye & Chenchen Xu & Huanyin Yue, 2023. "Data-Driven Insights into Population Exposure Risks: Towards Sustainable and Safe Urban Airspace Utilization by Unmanned Aerial Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Pang, Bizhao & Hu, Xinting & Dai, Wei & Low, Kin Huat, 2022. "UAV path optimization with an integrated cost assessment model considering third-party risks in metropolitan environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:10:p:1894-1906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.