IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v16y1996i5p717-723.html

Risk Perception: An Empirical Study of the Relationship Between Worldview and the Risk Construct

Author

Listed:
  • Christina G. S. Palmer

Abstract

This study empirically assesses the performance of Holtgrave and Weber's Simplified Conjoint Expected Risk (SCER) model for financial and health stimuli in 3 groups of “worldview holders”—12 hierarchists, 10 individualists, and 16 egalitarians—as described by cultural theory. The SCER model performed well, however, distinctive patterns of model variable selection appeared within each group. Interestingly, the pattern of variable selection paralleled cultural theory's descriptions of each worldview. Differences in the mean perceived risk of activities also tended to correspond to predictions made by cultural theory. Results suggest two mechanisms to explain differences in perceived risk among worldviews: (i) same model variables are evaluated, but given different weight; (ii) different variables are evaluated. Identifying the relevant mechanism for a given situation may enhance the effectiveness of risk communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina G. S. Palmer, 1996. "Risk Perception: An Empirical Study of the Relationship Between Worldview and the Risk Construct," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(5), pages 717-723, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:16:y:1996:i:5:p:717-723
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00820.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00820.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb00820.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David R. Holtgrave & Elke U. Weber, 1993. "Dimensions of Risk Perception for Financial and Health Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(5), pages 553-558, October.
    2. Charles F. Keown, 1989. "Risk Perceptions of Hong Kongese vs. Americans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 401-405, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gülbanu Kaptan & Shoshana Shiloh & Dilek Önkal, 2013. "Values and Risk Perceptions: A Cross‐Cultural Examination," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 318-332, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert N. Bontempo & William P. Bottom & Elke U. Weber, 1997. "Cross‐Cultural Differences in Risk Perception: A Model‐Based Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 479-488, August.
    2. Andy Zuchandke & Sebastian Reddemann & Simone Krummaker & J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg, 2010. "Impact of the Introduction of the Social Long-Term Care Insurance in Germany on Financial Security Assessment in Case of Long-Term Care Need," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 35(4), pages 626-643, October.
    3. Werner Gleißner & Florian Follert & Frank Daumann & Frank Leibbrand, 2021. "EU’s Ordering of COVID-19 Vaccine Doses: Political Decision-Making under Uncertainty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Tianjun Feng & L. Robin Keller & Liangyan Wang & Yitong Wang, 2010. "Product Quality Risk Perceptions and Decisions: Contaminated Pet Food and Lead‐Painted Toys," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1572-1589, October.
    5. Lonzozou Kpanake & Bruno Chauvin & Etienne Mullet, 2008. "Societal Risk Perception Among African Villagers Without Access to the Media," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 193-202, February.
    6. Seraphin Kalala & Robert Grosse & Albert Wocke, 2024. "Management of Global Value Chains and Risk: An Application to Emerging Markets," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 925-954, December.
    7. Atasoy, Özgün & Trudel, Remi & Noseworthy, Theodore J. & Kaufmann, Patrick J., 2022. "Tangibility bias in investment risk judgments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Mahmaod Alrawad & Abdalwali Lutfi & Sundus Alyatama & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Mohammed Amin Almaiah, 2022. "Perception of Occupational and Environmental Risks and Hazards among Mineworkers: A Psychometric Paradigm Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Markus R. Schmidt & Wei Wei, 2006. "Loss of Agro‐Biodiversity, Uncertainty, and Perceived Control: A Comparative Risk Perception Study in Austria and China," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 455-470, April.
    10. Craig W. Trumbo, 1996. "Examining Psychometrics and Polarization in a Single‐Risk Case Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 429-438, June.
    11. Elaine Gierlach & Bradley E. Belsher & Larry E. Beutler, 2010. "Cross‐Cultural Differences in Risk Perceptions of Disasters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1539-1549, October.
    12. Sara M. Constantino & Alicia D. Cooperman & Thiago M. Q. Moreira, 2021. "Voting in a global pandemic: Assessing dueling influences of Covid‐19 on turnout," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2210-2235, September.
    13. Nicolás C. Bronfman & Luis A. Cifuentes, 2003. "Risk Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Chile," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1271-1285, December.
    14. Elke U. Weber & Niklas Siebenmorgen & Martin Weber, 2005. "Communicating Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 597-609, June.
    15. Zhang Jianguang, 1994. "Environmental Hazards in the Chinese Public's Eyes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 163-167, April.
    16. Frank Daumann & Florian Follert & Werner Gleißner & Endre Kamarás & Chantal Naumann, 2021. "Political Decision Making in the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Germany from the Perspective of Risk Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, December.
    17. Julian Chuk‐ling Lai & Julia Tao, 2003. "Perception of Environmental Hazards in Hong Kong Chinese," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 669-684, August.
    18. Nathan Blascak & Ying Lei Toh, 2026. "Does Experience Matter? Past Fraud Experiences, Data Compromises, and Credit Market Behavior," Research Working Paper RWP 26-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    19. Grant, Kevin & Edgar, David & Sukumar, Arun & Meyer, Martin, 2014. "‘Risky business’: Perceptions of e-business risk by UK small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs)," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 99-122.
    20. Andersson, Lina, 2022. "Fear and Economic Behavior," Working Papers in Economics 819, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:16:y:1996:i:5:p:717-723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.