IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v59y2012i1p39-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group testing procedures with quantitative features and incomplete identification

Author

Listed:
  • Shaul K. Bar‐Lev
  • Onno Boxma
  • Andreas Löpker
  • Wolfgang Stadje
  • Frank A. Van der Duyn Schouten

Abstract

We present a group testing model for items characterized by marker random variables. An item is defined to be good (defective) if its marker is below (above) a given threshold. The items can be tested in groups; the goal is to obtain a prespecified number of good items by testing them in optimally sized groups. Besides this group size, the controller has to select a threshold value for the group marker sums, and the target number of groups which by the tests are classified to consist only of good items. These decision variables have to be chosen so as to minimize a cost function, which is a linear combination of the expected number of group tests and an expected penalty for missing the desired number of good items, subject to constraints on the probabilities of misclassifications. We treat two models of this kind: the first one is based on an infinite population size, whereas the second one deals with the case of a finite number of available items. All performance measures are derived in closed form; approximations are also given. Furthermore, we prove monotonicity properties of the components of the objective function and of the constraints. In several examples, we study (i) the dependence of the cost function on the decision variables and (ii) the dependence of the optimal values of the decision variables (group size, group marker threshold, and stopping rule for groups classified as clean) and of the target functionals (optimal expected number of tests, optimal expected penalty, and minimal expected cost) on the system parameters.© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Shaul K. Bar‐Lev & Onno Boxma & Andreas Löpker & Wolfgang Stadje & Frank A. Van der Duyn Schouten, 2012. "Group testing procedures with quantitative features and incomplete identification," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 39-51, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:1:p:39-51
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20489
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Chin Hung & William H. Swallow, 2000. "Use of Binomial Group Testing in Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariables," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 204-212, March.
    2. Lawrence M. Wein & Stefanos A. Zenios, 1996. "Pooled Testing for HIV Screening: Capturing the Dilution Effect," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 543-569, August.
    3. Graham Hepworth & Ray Watson, 2009. "Debiased estimation of proportions in group testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(1), pages 105-121, February.
    4. Shaul K. Bar‐Lev & Wolfgang Stadje & Frank A. Van der Duyn Schouten, 2006. "Group testing procedures with incomplete identification and unreliable testing results," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 281-296, May.
    5. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Wolfgang Stadje & Frank A. van der Duyn Schouten, 2004. "Optimal Group Testing with Processing Times and Incomplete Identification," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-72, March.
    6. Shaul K. Bar‐Lev & Arnon Boneh & David Perry, 1990. "Incomplete identification models for group‐testable items," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 647-659, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Hans Blanc & Onno Boxma & Guido Janssen & David Perry, 2013. "Tandem Queues with Impatient Customers for Blood Screening Procedures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 423-451, June.
    2. Bar-Lev, S.K. & Parlar, M. & Perry, D. & Stadje, W. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A., 2007. "Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification," Other publications TiSEM 0b1bfa5e-c1e6-43ec-9684-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Claeys, Dieter & Walraevens, Joris & Laevens, Koenraad & Bruneel, Herwig, 2010. "A queueing model for general group screening policies and dynamic item arrivals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 827-835, December.
    4. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Wolfgang Stadje & Frank A. van der Duyn Schouten, 2004. "Optimal Group Testing with Processing Times and Incomplete Identification," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-72, March.
    5. Bar-Lev, Shaul K. & Parlar, Mahmut & Perry, David & Stadje, Wolfgang & Van der Duyn Schouten, Frank A., 2007. "Applications of bulk queues to group testing models with incomplete identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 226-237, November.
    6. Bar-Lev, Shaul K. & Boxma, Onno & Kleiner, Igor & Perry, David & Stadje, Wolfgang, 2017. "Recycled incomplete identification procedures for blood screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 330-343.
    7. Nguyen, Ngoc T. & Bish, Ebru K. & Bish, Douglas R., 2021. "Optimal pooled testing design for prevalence estimation under resource constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    8. Jiejian Feng & Michael Zhang, 2017. "Reducing cost and abandoned E-components in incomplete identification," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(3), pages 281-290, March.
    9. Shaul K. Bar-Lev & Onno Boxma & Wolfgang Stadje & Frank A. Duyn Schouten, 2010. "A Two-Stage Group Testing Model for Infections with Window Periods," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 309-322, September.
    10. Jin-Taek Seong, 2020. "Theoretical Bounds on Performance in Threshold Group Testing Schemes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    11. Hae-Young Kim & Michael G. Hudgens & Jonathan M. Dreyfuss & Daniel J. Westreich & Christopher D. Pilcher, 2007. "Comparison of Group Testing Algorithms for Case Identification in the Presence of Test Error," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1152-1163, December.
    12. Bar-Lev, S.K. & Stadje, W. & van der Duyn Schouten, F.A., 2002. "Hypergeometric Group Testing with Incomplete Information," Other publications TiSEM bbeda767-e037-4441-a6d4-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Graham Hepworth & Brad J. Biggerstaff, 2017. "Bias Correction in Estimating Proportions by Pooled Testing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 602-614, December.
    14. Yongxi Cheng & Yinfeng Xu, 2014. "An efficient FPRAS type group testing procedure to approximate the number of defectives," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 302-314, February.
    15. Tarun Jain & Bijendra Nath Jain, 2021. "Infection Testing at Scale: An Examination of Pooled Testing Diagnostics," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(1), pages 13-26, March.
    16. A. Delaigle & P. Hall & J. R. Wishart, 2014. "New approaches to nonparametric and semiparametric regression for univariate and multivariate group testing data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(3), pages 567-585.
    17. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2020. "Optimal Group Testing: Structural Properties and Robust Solutions, with Application to Public Health Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 895-911, October.
    18. Hrayer Aprahamian & Hadi El-Amine, 2022. "Optimal Screening of Populations with Heterogeneous Risk Profiles Under the Availability of Multiple Tests," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 150-164, January.
    19. Sarah Kok & Alexander Rutherford & Reka Gustafson & Rolando Barrios & Julio Montaner & Krisztina Vasarhelyi, 2015. "Optimizing an HIV testing program using a system dynamics model of the continuum of care," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 334-362, September.
    20. Hrayer Aprahamian & Douglas R. Bish & Ebru K. Bish, 2019. "Optimal Risk-Based Group Testing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4365-4384, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:1:p:39-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.