IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v41y1994i3p317-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When is a base stock policy optimal in recovering disrupted cyclic schedules?

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Gallego

Abstract

The extended economic lot scheduling problem (EELSP) is concerned with scheduling the production of a set of items in a single facility to minimize the long‐run average holding, backlogging, and setup costs. Given an efficient cyclic production schedule for the EELSP, called the target schedule, we consider the problem of how to schedule production after a single schedule disruption. We propose a base stock policy, characterized by a base stock vector, that prescribes producing an item until its inventory level reaches the peak inventory of the target schedule corresponding to the item's position in the production sequence. We show that the base stock policy is always successful in recovering the target schedule. Moreover, the base stock policy recovers the target schedule at minimal excess over average cost whenever the backorder costs are proportional to the processing times. This condition holds, for example, when the value of the items is proportional to their processing times, and a common inventory carrying cost and a common service level is used for all the items. Alternatively, the proportionality condition holds if the inventory manager is willing to select the service levels from a certain set that is large enough to guarantee any minimal level of service, and then uses the imputed values for the backorder costs. When the proportionality condition holds we provide a closed‐form expression for the total relevant excess over average cost of recovering the target schedule. We assess the performance of the base stock policy when the proportionality condition does not hold through a numerical study, and suggest some heuristic uses of the base stock policy. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Gallego, 1994. "When is a base stock policy optimal in recovering disrupted cyclic schedules?," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 317-333, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:3:p:317-333
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-T
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-T
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199404)41:33.0.CO;2-T?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul H. Zipkin, 1991. "Computing Optimal Lot Sizes in the Economic Lot Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 56-63, February.
    2. William L. Maxwell, 1964. "The scheduling of economic lot sizes," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 89-124, June.
    3. Guillermo Gallego, 1990. "Scheduling the Production of Several Items with Random Demands in a Single Facility," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1579-1592, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Jian Yang & Xiangtong Qi & Gang Yu, 2005. "Disruption management in production planning," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 420-442, August.
    3. Antonio Arreola‐Risa & Gregory A. DeCroix, 1998. "Inventory management under random supply disruptions and partial backorders," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(7), pages 687-703, October.
    4. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    5. Donald D. Eisenstein, 2005. "Recovering Cyclic Schedules Using Dynamic Produce-Up-To Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 675-688, August.
    6. Rappold, James A. & Yoho, Keenan D., 2014. "Setting safety stocks for stable rotation cycle schedules," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 146-158.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillermo Gallego & Robin Roundy, 1992. "The economic lot scheduling problem with finite backorder costs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 729-739, August.
    2. David M. Markowitz & Martin I. Reiman & Lawrence M. Wein, 2000. "The Stochastic Economic Lot Scheduling Problem: Heavy Traffic Analysis of Dynamic Cyclic Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 136-154, February.
    3. Brander, Par & Forsberg, Rolf, 2006. "Determination of safety stocks for cyclic schedules with stochastic demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 271-295, December.
    4. Segerstedt, Anders, 1999. "Lot sizes in a capacity constrained facility with available initial inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 469-475, March.
    5. Kelle, Peter & Peak, David, 1996. "A comparison of fixed and adaptive type controls for multi-product processing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 139-146, August.
    6. McGee, Victor E. & Pyke, David F., 1996. "Periodic production scheduling at a fastener manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 65-87, December.
    7. Garn, Wolfgang & Aitken, James, 2015. "Agile factorial production for a single manufacturing line with multiple products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 754-766.
    8. Vaughan, Timothy S., 2007. "Cyclical schedules vs. dynamic sequencing: Replenishment dynamics and inventory efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 518-527, June.
    9. Sridhar Tayur, 2000. "Improving Operations and Quoting Accurate Lead Times in a Laminate Plant," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Brander, Par & Leven, Erik & Segerstedt, Anders, 2005. "Lot sizes in a capacity constrained facility--a simulation study of stationary stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 375-386, January.
    11. Wagner, Michael & Smits, Sanne R., 2004. "A local search algorithm for the optimization of the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 391-402, August.
    12. B.C. Giri & I. Moon & W.Y. Yun, 2003. "Scheduling economic lot sizes in deteriorating production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(6), pages 650-661, September.
    13. Briskorn, Dirk & Zeise, Philipp & Packowski, Josef, 2016. "Quasi-fixed cyclic production schemes for multiple products with stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 156-169.
    14. Donald D. Eisenstein, 2005. "Recovering Cyclic Schedules Using Dynamic Produce-Up-To Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 675-688, August.
    15. Ramesh Bollapragada & Uday Rao, 1999. "Single-Stage Resource Allocation and Economic Lot Scheduling on Multiple, Nonidentical Production Lines," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 889-904, June.
    16. Beck, Fabian G. & Biel, Konstantin & Glock, Christoph H., 2019. "Integration of energy aspects into the economic lot scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 399-410.
    17. Robert R. Inman & Philip C. Jones & Guillermo M. Gallego, 1991. "Economic lot scheduling of fully loaded processes with external setups," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 699-713, October.
    18. Pesenti, Raffaele & Ukovich, Walter, 2003. "Economic lot scheduling on multiple production lines with resource constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 469-481, January.
    19. David M. Markowitz & Lawrence M. Wein, 2001. "Heavy Traffic Analysis of Dynamic Cyclic Policies: A Unified Treatment of the Single Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 246-270, April.
    20. Khouja, Moutaz & Michalewicz, Zgibniew & Wilmot, Michael, 1998. "The use of genetic algorithms to solve the economic lot size scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(3), pages 509-524, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:3:p:317-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.