IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v37y2013i1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and guidelines for public policies on climate change adaptation: A missed opportunity of scientific knowledge‐brokerage

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Clar
  • Andrea Prutsch
  • Reinhard Steurer

Abstract

Progress in formulating and implementing effective adaptation policies is often hampered by a wide variety of barriers that are well documented in the literature. Among the barriers are lack of awareness, certainty, resources and political commitment. Since these and other barriers can be overcome (e.g., by raising awareness, closing knowledge gaps, and increasing resources), numerous decision‐support frameworks (mainly written guidelines) have been developed for this purpose. The present paper takes stock of both the barriers in adaptation policymaking, as documented in the literature, and the guidelines that aim to facilitate public policies on climate change adaptation. It then compares to what degree selected adaptation guidelines serve as knowledge‐brokerage tools that provide guidance on how to overcome the barriers addressed in the scientific literature. The comparison shows that adaptation guidelines address barriers of adaptation policymaking neither comprehensively nor systematically. Since most adaptation guidelines focus on (subjective) experiences with good practices than on empirical research findings, we conclude that they represent a missed opportunity of scientific knowledge‐brokerage in climate change adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Clar & Andrea Prutsch & Reinhard Steurer, 2013. "Barriers and guidelines for public policies on climate change adaptation: A missed opportunity of scientific knowledge‐brokerage," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:1-18
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12013
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.12013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Burton & Saleemul Huq & Bo Lim & Olga Pilifosova & Emma Lisa Schipper, 2002. "From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2-3), pages 145-159, September.
    2. Dave Huitema & Andrew Jordan & Eric Massey & Tim Rayner & Harro Asselt & Constanze Haug & Roger Hildingsson & Suvi Monni & Johannes Stripple, 2011. "The evaluation of climate policy: theory and emerging practice in Europe," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(2), pages 179-198, June.
    3. Frans Berkhout, 2005. "Rationales for adaptation in EU climate change policies," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 377-391, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Marques & João Leitão & Alba Carvalho & Dina Pereira, 2021. "Public Administration and Values Oriented to Sustainability: A Systematic Approach to the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Mirna Panic & James D. Ford, 2013. "A Review of National-Level Adaptation Planning with Regards to the Risks Posed by Climate Change on Infectious Diseases in 14 OECD Nations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Raile Eric D. & Young Linda M. & Kirinya Julian & Bonabana-Wabbi Jackline & Raile Amber N. W., 2021. "Building Public Will for Climate-Smart Agriculture in Uganda: Prescriptions for Industry and Policy," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 39-50, May.
    4. Seunghan Lee & Jouni Paavola & Suraje Dessai, 2023. "Deeper understanding of the barriers to national climate adaptation policy: the case of South Korea," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Beatriz Kauark-Fontes & César E. Ortiz-Guerrero & Livia Marchetti & Jaime Hernández-Garcia & Fabio Salbitano, 2023. "Towards Adaptive Governance of Urban Nature-Based Solutions in Europe and Latin America—A Qualitative Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Stephanie E. Austin & James D. Ford & Lea Berrang-Ford & Malcolm Araos & Stephen Parker & Manon D. Fleury, 2015. "Public Health Adaptation to Climate Change in Canadian Jurisdictions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dobes Leo & Jotzo Frank & Stern David I., 2014. "The Economics of Global Climate Change: A Historical Literature Review," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 65(3), pages 281-320, December.
    2. Fobissie Kalame & Johnson Nkem & Monica Idinoba & Markku Kanninen, 2009. "Matching national forest policies and management practices for climate change adaptation in Burkina Faso and Ghana," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 135-151, February.
    3. Pierre Mukheibir, 2008. "Water Resources Management Strategies for Adaptation to Climate-Induced Impacts in South Africa," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(9), pages 1259-1276, September.
    4. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Ella Furness & Harry Nelson, 2016. "Are human values and community participation key to climate adaptation? The case of community forest organisations in British Columbia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 243-259, March.
    6. Akiko Yamane, 2009. "Climate Change and Hazardscape of Sri Lanka," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(10), pages 2396-2416, October.
    7. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Kuik, Onno & Paglialunga, Elena, 2016. "Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-259.
    8. Kuang, Bing & Han, Jing & Lu, Xinhai & Zhang, Xupeng & Fan, Xiangyu, 2020. "Quantitative evaluation of China’s cultivated land protection policies based on the PMC-Index model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Michelle Scobie, 2018. "Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 769-787, April.
    10. Shiva Salehi & Ali Ardalan & Gholamreza Garmaroudi & Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh & Abbas Rahimiforoushani & Armin Zareiyan, 2019. "Climate change adaptation: a systematic review on domains and indicators," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 521-550, March.
    11. C. Ordóñez & P. Duinker, 2015. "Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 531-543, August.
    12. Brennan Vogel & Daniel Henstra & Gordon McBean, 2020. "Sub-national government efforts to activate and motivate local climate change adaptation: Nova Scotia, Canada," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1633-1653, February.
    13. Tahereh Zobeidi & Jafar Yaghoubi & Masoud Yazdanpanah, 2022. "Developing a paradigm model for the analysis of farmers' adaptation to water scarcity," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5400-5425, April.
    14. Rick Baker & Andrew Barker & Alan Johnston & Michael Kohlhaas, 2008. "The Stern Review: an assessment of its methodology," Staff Working Papers 0801, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    15. Jonatan Pinkse & Ans Kolk, 2012. "Addressing the climate change sustainable development nexus: the role of multi-stakeholder partnerships," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00707337, HAL.
    16. Livia Bizikova & Maria Nijnik & Anatoliy Nijnik, 2015. "Exploring institutional changes in agriculture to inform adaptation planning to climate change in transition countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1385-1406, December.
    17. Rutty, Michelle & Scott, Daniel & Johnson, Peter & Pons, Marc & Steiger, Robert & Vilella, Marc, 2017. "Using ski industry response to climatic variability to assess climate change risk: An analogue study in Eastern Canada," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 196-204.
    18. Jean-Sébastien Broc & Gregor Thenius & Dario Di Santo & Barbara Schlomann & Barbara Breitschopf & Jamilja van Der Meulen & Paul van den Oosterkamp & Lovorko Marić & Marko Matosović, 2018. "What can we learn from sharing experience about evaluation practices?," Post-Print hal-02425109, HAL.
    19. J. Coleman & F. Sosa-Rodriguez & L. Mortsch & P. Deadman, 2016. "Assessing stakeholder impacts and adaptation to low water-levels: the Trent-Severn waterway," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 115-129, January.
    20. Isaure Delaporte & Mathilde Maurel, 2018. "Adaptation to climate change in Bangladesh," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 49-62, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:37:y:2013:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.