IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1528-1537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace bullying, biased behaviours and performance review in the nursing profession: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Susan L. Johnson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore staff nurses’ discourses of workplace bullying, to critically examine how these discourses affect their responses to bullying. Background Workplace bullying has been identified as a pervasive problem within the nursing profession. Efforts to eradicate workplace bullying need to involve staff—targets as well as bystanders. By understanding how this population conceptualises workplace bullying, more effective and targeted solutions to the problem can be devised. Design This qualitative study used a critical discourse analysis method which was based on the work of Foucault. Methods Thirteen staff nurses who worked in a variety of settings in the USA were interviewed. COREQ checklist was used for this article. Results Three interrelated discursive strands were identified: “biased behaviour manifested as workplace bullying, workplace bullying disguised as performance review and workplace bullying as entrenched behaviour in nursing”. Actions in response to bullying varied according to which discursive strand was invoked. Conclusions The central theme at the intersection of the discursive strands was that workplace bullying is a mechanism for driving out nurses who are different. Relevance to clinical practice Efforts to address workplace bullying among nurses need to include training on legitimate methods of performance review, workshops on how to interact with diverse co‐workers, and examination of how practices with nursing education contribute to the perpetuation of bullying in clinical settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan L. Johnson, 2019. "Workplace bullying, biased behaviours and performance review in the nursing profession: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1528-1537, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1528-1537
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie Hutchinson & Margaret H Vickers & Lesley Wilkes & Debra Jackson, 2010. "A typology of bullying behaviours: the experiences of Australian nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2319-2328, August.
    2. Donna A. Gaffney & Rosanna F. DeMarco & Anne Hofmeyer & Judith A. Vessey & Wendy C. Budin, 2012. "Making Things Right: Nurses' Experiences with Workplace Bullying—A Grounded Theory," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-10, April.
    3. Helen Courtney‐Pratt & Jacqueline Pich & Tracy Levett‐Jones & Annette Moxey, 2018. "“I was yelled at, intimidated and treated unfairly”: Nursing students' experiences of being bullied in clinical and academic settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 903-912, March.
    4. Mami Yokoyama & Miho Suzuki & Yukari Takai & Ayumi Igarashi & Maiko Noguchi‐Watanabe & Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani, 2016. "Workplace bullying among nurses and their related factors in Japan: a cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2478-2488, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Juliet McMahon & Michelle O’Sullivan & Sarah MacCurtain & Caroline Murphy & Lorraine Ryan, 2021. "“It’s Not Us, It’s You!”: Extending Managerial Control through Coercion and Internalisation in the Context of Workplace Bullying amongst Nurses in Ireland," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Haeyoung Lee & Young Mi Ryu & Mi Yu & Haejin Kim & Seieun Oh, 2022. "A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Studies on Workplace Bullying among Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike O'Driscoll & Helen Allan & Liang Liu & Kevin Corbett & Laura Serrant, 2018. "Compassion in practice—Evaluating the awareness, involvement and perceived impact of a national nursing and midwifery strategy amongst healthcare professionals in NHS Trusts in England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1097-1109, March.
    2. Martin Charette & Johanne Goudreau & Anne Bourbonnais, 2019. "Factors influencing the practice of new graduate nurses: A focused ethnography of acute care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3618-3631, October.
    3. Fereshteh Najafi & Masoud Fallahi‐Khoshknab & Fazlollah Ahmadi & Asghar Dalvandi & Mehdi Rahgozar, 2017. "Human dignity and professional reputation under threat: Iranian Nurses' experiences of workplace violence," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 44-50, March.
    4. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Janki Shankar & Lun Li & Shawn Tan, 2021. "Work Experiences and Challenges to Employment Sustainability for People With Mental Illness in Supported Employment Programs," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    6. Fereshteh Najafi & Masoud Fallahi‐Khoshknab & Fazlollah Ahmadi & Asghar Dalvandi & Mehdi Rahgozar, 2018. "Antecedents and consequences of workplace violence against nurses: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 116-128, January.
    7. Elsie Hepburn & Esther Daniel & Philip Onuoha, 2020. "Nurses’ Bullying Experiences: A Case study of a Caribbean Major Island Hospital," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Rainier C. Moreno‐Lacalle & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Workplace incivility and its influence on professional quality of life among nurses from multicultural background: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2553-2564, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1528-1537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.