IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe1097-e1109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compassion in practice—Evaluating the awareness, involvement and perceived impact of a national nursing and midwifery strategy amongst healthcare professionals in NHS Trusts in England

Author

Listed:
  • Mike O'Driscoll
  • Helen Allan
  • Liang Liu
  • Kevin Corbett
  • Laura Serrant

Abstract

Aims and objectives To report the findings from an evaluation of the impact of the Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy (National Health Service England (NHSE), 2012) on nursing, midwifery and care staff. Background The Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy was a programme of work to highlight the importance of compassionate care following the Francis Report in 2013 into the deficits in care in an NHS Hospital Trust. It was launched by NHS England in 2012 at a time when fiscal cuts were introduced by the Department of Health in England. Design and setting Mixed methods. Results Inferential statistics were used to test whether there were significant differences between staff at different levels of seniority with regard to awareness and involvement in Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy and their attitudes to it. Awareness and involvement of staff in Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy were high amongst middle and senior management but limited at ward level. Staff involvement in Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy was limited due to a lack of awareness. Ward level staff who were aware and involved, perceived a lack of support and communication from senior leadership to deliver the Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy. Discussion Results reveal professional anger, distress and resistance to the Compassion in Practice Vision and Strategy and a view of the programme as a top‐down initiative which did not sufficiently recognise structural constraints on nurses’ ability to deliver compassionate care. We discuss the implications of our findings for global nursing. Conclusion Participants emphasised that compassion for patients is only sustainable where there is compassion for staff and many participants felt that they were not being treated with compassion. Relevance for clinical practice National Health Service England should strongly affirm that nurses and midwives in general provide compassionate care. Trust leadership should provide support for ward level staff who deliver compassionate care in difficult circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike O'Driscoll & Helen Allan & Liang Liu & Kevin Corbett & Laura Serrant, 2018. "Compassion in practice—Evaluating the awareness, involvement and perceived impact of a national nursing and midwifery strategy amongst healthcare professionals in NHS Trusts in England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1097-1109, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1097-e1109
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna A. Gaffney & Rosanna F. DeMarco & Anne Hofmeyer & Judith A. Vessey & Wendy C. Budin, 2012. "Making Things Right: Nurses' Experiences with Workplace Bullying—A Grounded Theory," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-10, April.
    2. Fiona Timmins & Jan MA de Vries, 2015. "Editorial: Follow the yellow brick road‐ the compassion deficit debate where to from here?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2689-2694, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan L. Johnson, 2019. "Workplace bullying, biased behaviours and performance review in the nursing profession: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1528-1537, May.
    2. Fereshteh Najafi & Masoud Fallahi‐Khoshknab & Fazlollah Ahmadi & Asghar Dalvandi & Mehdi Rahgozar, 2017. "Human dignity and professional reputation under threat: Iranian Nurses' experiences of workplace violence," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 44-50, March.
    3. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Janki Shankar & Lun Li & Shawn Tan, 2021. "Work Experiences and Challenges to Employment Sustainability for People With Mental Illness in Supported Employment Programs," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    5. Elsie Hepburn & Esther Daniel & Philip Onuoha, 2020. "Nurses’ Bullying Experiences: A Case study of a Caribbean Major Island Hospital," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Rainier C. Moreno‐Lacalle & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Workplace incivility and its influence on professional quality of life among nurses from multicultural background: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2553-2564, July.
    7. Fiona Timmins & Carole King & Jan MA de Vries & Martin Johnson & John G Cullen & Carol Haigh, 2018. "Altruism, honesty and religiosity in nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3687-3698, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1097-e1109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.