IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p3977-3990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross‐sectional survey of factors associated with paternal involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Gina Clarkson
  • Mary Jo Gilmer
  • Elizabeth Moore
  • Mary S. Dietrich
  • Brent A. McBride

Abstract

Aim and objective To describe factors associated with father involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit using the Heuristic model of the dynamic of parental behaviour and influence on children over time. Background Research shows that infants with involved fathers have better cognitive development, fewer crying episodes after caesarean birth, improved breastfeeding exclusivity and duration, and more regular sleep patterns. Preterm infants with involved fathers have improved cognitive development. Design This cross‐sectional exploratory study used survey methodology to explore factors associated with father involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit. Methods The STROBE checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used (see Appendix S2). Biological fathers of infants in a 97‐bed neonatal intensive care unit in the southern USA completed a survey which asked about their involvement with their hospitalised infants and factors which affected that involvement. Eighty fathers completed the survey. Results Age ranged between 20–53 with 43% first‐time fathers. Compared to less involved fathers, fathers who were more involved were younger, married or living with the mother, performed kangaroo care or fathers of multiple gestation. Fathers who had attended the delivery were more likely to bathe their infants than those who had not attended the delivery and fathers who performed kangaroo care felt more confident than those who did not. Compared to fathers who visited less often, fathers who visited more often were younger, had infants with a shorter hospitalisation time and lower acuity, and had fewer children in the family. Conclusions Fathers are involved with their neonatal intensive care unit infants in many ways. Factors were identified that affect involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit. Relevance to clinical practice Results can help nurses in neonatal intensive care units worldwide facilitate father–infant interaction, identify fathers at risk for decreased involvement and advocate for institutional policy development for supporting neonatal intensive care unit father involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Gina Clarkson & Mary Jo Gilmer & Elizabeth Moore & Mary S. Dietrich & Brent A. McBride, 2019. "Cross‐sectional survey of factors associated with paternal involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3977-3990, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3977-3990
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Livio Provenzi & Elena Santoro, 2015. "The lived experience of fathers of preterm infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1784-1794, July.
    2. Anna Aftyka & Beata Rybojad & Wojciech Rosa & Aleksandra Wróbel & Hanna Karakuła‐Juchnowicz, 2017. "Risk factors for the development of post‐traumatic stress disorder and coping strategies in mothers and fathers following infant hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4436-4445, December.
    3. Suza Trajkovski & Virginia Schmied & Margaret Vickers & Debra Jackson, 2012. "Neonatal nurses’ perspectives of family‐centred care: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(17‐18), pages 2477-2487, September.
    4. Nancy Feeley & Elana Waitzer & Kathryn Sherrard & Linda Boisvert & Phyllis Zelkowitz, 2013. "Fathers’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to their involvement with their newborn hospitalised in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 521-530, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pia Lundqvist & Janne Weis & Bengt Sivberg, 2019. "Parents’ journey caring for a preterm infant until discharge from hospital‐based neonatal home care—A challenging process to cope with," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2966-2978, August.
    2. Comrie-Thomson, Liz & Gopal, Prerna & Eddy, Katherine & Baguiya, Adama & Gerlach, Nina & Sauvé, Caroline & Portela, Anayda, 2021. "How do women, men, and health providers perceive interventions to influence men's engagement in maternal and newborn health? A qualitative evidence synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    3. Anne Brødsgaard & Jette Thise Pedersen & Palle Larsen & Janne Weis, 2019. "Parents' and nurses' experiences of partnership in neonatal intensive care units: A qualitative review and meta‐synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3117-3139, September.
    4. Tiffany Conroy, 2018. "Factors influencing the delivery of the fundamentals of care: Perceptions of nurses, nursing leaders and healthcare consumers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2373-2386, June.
    5. Mariana Bueno & Rebeca Nogueira Costa & Patrícia Ponce de Camargo & Taine Costa & Denise Harrison, 2018. "Evaluation of a parent‐targeted video in Portuguese to improve pain management practices in neonates," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1153-1159, March.
    6. Cathrine Fowler & Janet Green & Doug Elliott & Julia Petty & Lisa Whiting, 2019. "The forgotten mothers of extremely preterm babies: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2124-2134, June.
    7. Mahni Rahkar Farshi & Leila Valizadeh & Vahid Zamanzadeh & Mryam Rssouli & Violeta Lopez & Michelle Cleary, 2018. "Perceptions of Iranian parents towards the paternal role in raising adolescent children," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 479-485, December.
    8. Julia Petty & Joy Jarvis & Rebecca Thomas, 2019. "Understanding parents’ emotional experiences for neonatal education: A narrative, interpretive approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1911-1924, May.
    9. Kathy McKay & Elizabeth O’Nions & Sarah Wayland & David Ferguson & Eilis Kennedy, 2021. "Fears, Reassurance, and Milestones: A Twitter Analysis around World Prematurity Day during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Concetta Polizzi & Giovanna Perricone & Maria Regina Morales & Sofia Burgio, 2021. "A Study of Maternal Competence in Preterm Birth Condition, during the Transition from Hospital to Home: An Early Intervention Program’s Proposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-24, August.
    11. Pei‐Fan Mu & Mei‐Yin Lee & Yong‐Chuan Chen & Hui‐Chuan Yang & Shu‐Hua Yang, 2020. "Experiences of parents providing kangaroo care to a premature infant: A qualitative systematic review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 149-161, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:3977-3990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.