IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p4436-4445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors for the development of post‐traumatic stress disorder and coping strategies in mothers and fathers following infant hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Aftyka
  • Beata Rybojad
  • Wojciech Rosa
  • Aleksandra Wróbel
  • Hanna Karakuła‐Juchnowicz

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to identify the potential risk factors for the development of post‐traumatic stress disorder in mothers and fathers following infant hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Background The development of neonatal intensive care units has increased the survival rate of infants. However, one of the major parental problems is post‐traumatic stress disorder. Design An observational study covered 125 parents (72 mothers and 53 fathers) of infants aged 3–12 months who were hospitalised in the neonatal intensive care unit during the neonatal period. Setting Third‐referral neonatal intensive care unit. Several standardised and self‐reported research tools were used to estimate the level of post‐traumatic stress symptoms (Impact Event Scale—Revised), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and coping strategies (COPE Inventory). The respondents also completed a Parent and Infant Characteristic Questionnaire. Results The mothers and fathers did not differ in their parental and infant characteristics. Post‐traumatic stress disorder was present in 60% of the mothers and 47% of the fathers. Compared to the fathers, the mothers felt greater stress (p = .020) and presented a higher severity of post‐traumatic stress disorder (p

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Aftyka & Beata Rybojad & Wojciech Rosa & Aleksandra Wróbel & Hanna Karakuła‐Juchnowicz, 2017. "Risk factors for the development of post‐traumatic stress disorder and coping strategies in mothers and fathers following infant hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4436-4445, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4436-4445
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13773
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cathrine Fowler & Janet Green & Doug Elliott & Julia Petty & Lisa Whiting, 2019. "The forgotten mothers of extremely preterm babies: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2124-2134, June.
    2. Julia Petty & Joy Jarvis & Rebecca Thomas, 2019. "Understanding parents’ emotional experiences for neonatal education: A narrative, interpretive approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1911-1924, May.
    3. Kathy McKay & Elizabeth O’Nions & Sarah Wayland & David Ferguson & Eilis Kennedy, 2021. "Fears, Reassurance, and Milestones: A Twitter Analysis around World Prematurity Day during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Gina Clarkson & Mary Jo Gilmer & Elizabeth Moore & Mary S. Dietrich & Brent A. McBride, 2019. "Cross‐sectional survey of factors associated with paternal involvement in the neonatal intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3977-3990, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:4436-4445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.