IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p669-676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pain assessment by emergency nurses at triage in the emergency department: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Marilène Vuille
  • Maryline Foerster
  • Eliane Foucault
  • Olivier Hugli

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the assessment of pain intensity in the specific context of triage. Background Acute pain affects most patients admitted to emergency departments, but pain relief in this setting remains insufficient. Evaluation of pain and its treatment at the time of patient triage expedites the administration of analgesia, but may be awkward at this time‐pressured moment. The assessment of pain intensity by a validated pain scale is a critical initial step, and a patient's self‐reporting is widely considered as the key to effective pain management. According to good practice guidelines, clinicians must accept a patient's statement, regardless of their own opinions. Design A qualitative methodology rooted in interactionist sociology and on the Grounded theory was used to provide an opportunity to uncover complex decision‐making processes, such as those involved in assessing pain. Methods A sociologist conducted semi‐structured interviews during the 2013–2014 winter months with twelve nurses and trained in the use of an established protocol, focusing on the assessment of pain intensity. The interviews were recorded, fully transcribed and analysed. Results The most frequently used pain scale was the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale. Discrepancies between self‐assessment and evaluation by a nurse were common. To restore congruence between the two, nurses used various tactics, such as using different definitions of the high‐end anchor of the scale, providing additional explanations about the scale, or using abnormal vital signs or the acceptance of morphine as a proof of the validity of severe pain ratings. Conclusions Nurses cannot easily suspend their own judgement. Their tactics do not express a lack of professionalism, but are consistent with the logic of professional intervention. Relevance to clinical practice This article presents triage nurses’ reality in a time‐pressured environment, and understanding this conflict may outline new educational targets to further improve pain management in ED.

Suggested Citation

  • Marilène Vuille & Maryline Foerster & Eliane Foucault & Olivier Hugli, 2018. "Pain assessment by emergency nurses at triage in the emergency department: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 669-676, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:669-676
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13992
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werner, Anne & Malterud, Kirsti, 2003. "It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 1409-1419, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melander, Stina, 2023. "Different logics of pain: the gendered dimension of chronic pain in a relational setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    2. Emily D. Heaphy, 2013. "Repairing Breaches with Rules: Maintaining Institutions in the Face of Everyday Disruptions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1291-1315, October.
    3. Wamsiedel, Marius, 2020. "Credibility work and moral evaluation at the ED," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    4. Santer, Miriam & Wyke, Sally & Warner, Pam, 2008. "Women's management of menstrual symptoms: Findings from a postal survey and qualitative interviews," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 276-288, January.
    5. Hicks, Alison, 2022. "The missing link: Towards an integrated health and information literacy research agenda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    6. Malat, Jennifer R. & van Ryn, Michelle & Purcell, David, 2006. "Race, socioeconomic status, and the perceived importance of positive self-presentation in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2479-2488, May.
    7. Dumit, Joseph, 2006. "Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 577-590, February.
    8. Maria Wiklund & Ann Öhman & Carita Bengs & Eva-Britt Malmgren-Olsson, 2014. "Living Close to the Edge," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, May.
    9. Ida Björkman & Magnus Simrén & Gisela Ringström & Eva Jakobsson Ung, 2016. "Patients’ experiences of healthcare encounters in severe irritable bowel syndrome: an analysis based on narrative and feminist theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2967-2978, October.
    10. Koekkoek, B. & Hutschemaekers, G. & van Meijel, B. & Schene, A., 2011. "How do patients come to be seen as 'difficult'?: A mixed-methods study in community mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 504-512, February.
    11. Jaworska, Sylvia & Ryan, Kath, 2018. "Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients' narratives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 107-114.
    12. Parizot, Isabelle & Chauvin, Pierre & Paugam, Serge, 2005. "The moral career of poor patients in free clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1369-1380, September.
    13. Pryma, Jane, 2017. "“Even my sister says I'm acting like a crazy to get a check”: Race, gender, and moral boundary-work in women's claims of disabling chronic pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 66-73.
    14. Kristin Margrethe Heggen & Henrik Berg, 2021. "Epistemic injustice in the age of evidence-based practice: The case of fibromyalgia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-6, December.
    15. Rasmussen, Erik Børve, 2020. "Rhetorical work and medical authority: Constructing convincing cases in insurance medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Alexandra Fernandes & Lotte-Lise Skotnes & Maria Major & Pedro Fontes Falcão, 2020. "Clinicians’ Perceptions of Norwegian Women’s Experiences of Infertility Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Ernesto González-Mesa & Jesús Jiménez-López & Marta Blasco-Alonso & Daniel Lubián-López, 2021. "Obstetricians’ Attitude towards Childbirth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-11, October.
    18. Sim, Julius & Madden, Sue, 2008. "Illness experience in fibromyalgia syndrome: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 57-67, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:669-676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.