IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2021y2021i1n3572555.html

An Enhanced Method for Tail Index Estimation under Missingness

Author

Listed:
  • F. Ayiah-Mensah
  • R. Minkah
  • L. Asiedu
  • F. O. Mettle

Abstract

Extreme events in earthquakes, wind speed, among others are rare but may lead to catastrophic effects on humans and the environment. The primary parameter in the estimation of such rare events is the tail index which measures the tail heaviness of an underlying distribution. Since extreme events are rare, the presence of missing observations may further lead to flawed. In view of this, there is a growing effort by researchers to address this problem. However, the existing methods of estimating the tail index use only the available nonmissing data. Thus, if the missing observations are influential values, ignoring them could introduce more bias and higher mean square error (MSE) in the tail index estimation and subsequently other extreme event‐‐estimators such as high quantiles and small exceedance probabilities. In this study, we propose imputation of the missing observations before applying some standard estimators (Hill and geometric‐type) to estimate the tail index. Through a simulation study, we assess the performance of the standard estimators under the proposed data enhancement method and the existing modified estimators of the tail index. The results show that the enhanced estimators have relatively lower bias and MSE. The estimation method was illustrated with a practical dataset on wind speed with missing values. Therefore, we recommend imputation mechanism as viable for enhancing the performance of tail index estimators in the case where there is missingness.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Ayiah-Mensah & R. Minkah & L. Asiedu & F. O. Mettle, 2021. "An Enhanced Method for Tail Index Estimation under Missingness," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2021(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:n:3572555
    DOI: 10.1155/2021/3572555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3572555
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2021/3572555?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yizeng & Qi, Yongcheng, 2019. "Adjusted empirical likelihood method for the tail index of a heavy-tailed distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 50-58.
    2. M. Ivette Gomes & Armelle Guillou, 2015. "Extreme Value Theory and Statistics of Univariate Extremes: A Review," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 83(2), pages 263-292, August.
    3. Ma, Yaolan & Jiang, Yuexiang & Huang, Wei, 2018. "Empirical likelihood based inference for conditional Pareto-type tail index," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James H. McVittie & Orla A. Murphy, 2025. "Estimating Extreme Wave Surges in the Presence of Missing Data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xia Yang & Jing Zhang & Wei-Xin Ren, 2018. "Threshold selection for extreme value estimation of vehicle load effect on bridges," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(2), pages 15501477187, February.
    2. Helena Ferreira & Marta Ferreira, 2021. "Tail dependence and smoothness of time series," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 198-210, March.
    3. Igor Fedotenkov, 2020. "A Review of More than One Hundred Pareto-Tail Index Estimators," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 80(3), pages 245-299.
    4. Hongyu An & Boping Tian, 2024. "Varying Index Coefficient Model for Tail Index Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-35, June.
    5. Tobias Neumann, 2018. "Mortgages: estimating default correlation and forecasting default risk," Bank of England working papers 708, Bank of England.
    6. Bertrand Groslambert & Wan-Ni Lai, 2020. "Ranking tail risk across international stock markets," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(2), pages 1756-1768.
    7. Tjeerd de Vries & Alexis Akira Toda, 2022. "Capital and Labor Income Pareto Exponents Across Time and Space," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 1058-1078, December.
    8. Ahmed, Hanan, 2022. "Extreme value statistics using related variables," Other publications TiSEM 246f0f13-701c-4c0d-8e09-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Paulo M.M. Rodrigues & Nicolau João, 2024. "A simple but powerful tail index regression," Working Papers w202412, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    10. Gomes, M. Ivette & Henriques-Rodrigues, Lígia, 2016. "Competitive estimation of the extreme value index," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 128-135.
    11. Emanuele Taufer & Flavio Santi & Pier Luigi Novi Inverardi & Giuseppe Espa & Maria Michela Dickson, 2020. "Extreme Value Index Estimation by Means of an Inequality Curve," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Kan Chen & Tuoyuan Cheng, 2022. "Measuring Tail Risks," Papers 2209.07092, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    13. Daouia, Abdelaati & Girard, Stéphane & Stupfler, Gilles, 2021. "ExpectHill estimation, extreme risk and heavy tails," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 97-117.
    14. Lígia Henriques-Rodrigues & Frederico Caeiro & M. Ivette Gomes, 2024. "A New Class of Reduced-Bias Generalized Hill Estimators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Ivanilda Cabral & Frederico Caeiro & M. Ivette Gomes, 2022. "On the comparison of several classical estimators of the extreme value index," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 179-196, January.
    16. Frederico Caeiro & Ayana Mateus, 2023. "A New Class of Generalized Probability-Weighted Moment Estimators for the Pareto Distribution," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Kathrin Kirchen & William Harbert & Jay Apt & M. Granger Morgan, 2020. "A Solar‐Centric Approach to Improving Estimates of Exposure Processes for Coronal Mass Ejections," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 1020-1039, May.
    18. Ahmad Aboubacrène Ag & Deme El Hadji & Diop Aliou & Girard Stéphane, 2019. "Estimation of the tail-index in a conditional location-scale family of heavy-tailed distributions," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 394-417, January.
    19. Man, Xinyue & Tang, Qihe, 2024. "Tail risk driven by investment losses and exogenous shocks," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 712-737, September.
    20. Hund, Lauren & Schroeder, Benjamin & Rumsey, Kellin & Huerta, Gabriel, 2018. "Distinguishing between model- and data-driven inferences for high reliability statistical predictions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 201-210.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:n:3572555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.