IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/iecrev/v60y2019i2p801-820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Bidding And Contract Renegotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Hojin Jung
  • Georgia Kosmopoulou
  • Carlos Lamarche
  • Richard Sicotte

Abstract

When firms bid in procurement auctions, they take into account the likelihood of future contract renegotiations. If they anticipate that certain input quantities will change ex post, they have an incentive to strategically skew their itemized bids, thereby increasing profits for themselves and costs for the procuring agency. We develop and estimate a structural model of strategic bidding using a data set of road construction projects in Vermont. We find that bidding strategies lead to increased markups for renegotiated items and reduced markups for nonrenegotiated items, results consistent with bid‐skewing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hojin Jung & Georgia Kosmopoulou & Carlos Lamarche & Richard Sicotte, 2019. "Strategic Bidding And Contract Renegotiation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(2), pages 801-820, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:iecrev:v:60:y:2019:i:2:p:801-820
    DOI: 10.1111/iere.12368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/iere.12368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hojin Jung & Georgia Kosmopoulou & Robert Press & Richard Sicotte, 2022. "Subcontracting and the incidence of change orders in procurement contracts," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 247-264, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:iecrev:v:60:y:2019:i:2:p:801-820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.