IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v34y2023i2ne2754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emulation of greenhouse‐gas sensitivities using variational autoencoders

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Cartwright
  • Andrew Zammit‐Mangion
  • Nicholas M. Deutscher

Abstract

Flux inversion is the process by which sources and sinks of a gas are identified from observations of gas mole fraction. The inversion often involves running a Lagrangian particle dispersion model (LPDM) to generate simulations of the gas movement over a domain of interest. The LPDM must be run backward in time for every gas measurement, and this can be computationally prohibitive. To address this problem, here we develop a novel spatio‐temporal emulator for LPDM sensitivities that is built using a convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE, a two‐piece neural network capable of condensing and reconstructing images). With the encoder segment of the CVAE, we obtain approximate (variational) posterior distributions over latent variables in a low‐dimensional space. We then use a spatio‐temporal Gaussian process emulator on the low‐dimensional space to emulate new variables at prediction locations and time points. Emulated variables are then passed through the decoder segment of the CVAE to yield emulated sensitivities. We show that our CVAE‐based emulator outperforms the more traditional emulator built using empirical orthogonal functions and that it can be used with different LPDMs. We conclude that our emulation‐based approach can be used to reliably reduce the computing time needed to generate LPDM outputs for use in high‐resolution flux inversions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Cartwright & Andrew Zammit‐Mangion & Nicholas M. Deutscher, 2023. "Emulation of greenhouse‐gas sensitivities using variational autoencoders," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:34:y:2023:i:2:n:e2754
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2754
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devin Francom & Bruno Sansó & Vera Bulaevskaya & Donald Lucas & Matthew Simpson, 2019. "Inferring Atmospheric Release Characteristics in a Large Computer Experiment Using Bayesian Adaptive Splines," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1450-1465, October.
    2. Higdon, Dave & Gattiker, James & Williams, Brian & Rightley, Maria, 2008. "Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 570-583, June.
    3. Noel Cressie, 2018. "Mission CO2ntrol: A Statistical Scientist's Role in Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 152-168, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Aiello & Matteo Fontana & Alessandra Guglielmi, 2023. "Bayesian functional emulation of CO2 emissions on future climate change scenarios," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(8), December.
    2. Grant Hutchings & Bruno Sansó & James Gattiker & Devin Francom & Donatella Pasqualini, 2023. "Comparing emulation methods for a high‐resolution storm surge model," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), May.
    3. Hemez, François M. & Atamturktur, Sezer, 2011. "The dangers of sparse sampling for the quantification of margin and uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1220-1231.
    4. Drignei, Dorin, 2011. "A general statistical model for computer experiments with time series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 460-467.
    5. Hwang, Youngdeok & Kim, Hang J. & Chang, Won & Yeo, Kyongmin & Kim, Yongku, 2019. "Bayesian pollution source identification via an inverse physics model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 76-92.
    6. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, Ehsan, 2014. "Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 573-582.
    7. Ioannis Andrianakis & Ian R Vernon & Nicky McCreesh & Trevelyan J McKinley & Jeremy E Oakley & Rebecca N Nsubuga & Michael Goldstein & Richard G White, 2015. "Bayesian History Matching of Complex Infectious Disease Models Using Emulation: A Tutorial and a Case Study on HIV in Uganda," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    8. Samantha M. Roth & Ben Seiyon Lee & Sanjib Sharma & Iman Hosseini‐Shakib & Klaus Keller & Murali Haran, 2023. "Flood hazard model calibration using multiresolution model output," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
    9. Perrin, G., 2020. "Adaptive calibration of a computer code with time-series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    10. Liu, Yushan & Li, Luyi & Zhao, Sihan & Song, Shufang, 2021. "A global surrogate model technique based on principal component analysis and Kriging for uncertainty propagation of dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Hang Zhang & Yong Liu & Dongyang Yang & Guanpeng Dong, 2022. "PM 2.5 Concentrations Variability in North China Explored with a Multi-Scale Spatial Random Effect Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, August.
    12. White, Staci A. & Herbei, Radu, 2015. "A Monte Carlo approach to quantifying model error in Bayesian parameter estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 168-181.
    13. Mevin Hooten & Christopher Wikle & Michael Schwob, 2020. "Statistical Implementations of Agent‐Based Demographic Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 441-461, August.
    14. Leatherman, Erin R. & Dean, Angela M. & Santner, Thomas J., 2017. "Designing combined physical and computer experiments to maximize prediction accuracy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 346-362.
    15. Wu, Xu & Kozlowski, Tomasz & Meidani, Hadi, 2018. "Kriging-based inverse uncertainty quantification of nuclear fuel performance code BISON fission gas release model using time series measurement data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 422-436.
    16. Nott, David J. & Marshall, Lucy & Fielding, Mark & Liong, Shie-Yui, 2014. "Mixtures of experts for understanding model discrepancy in dynamic computer models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 491-505.
    17. Jeremy Rohmer, 2014. "Dynamic sensitivity analysis of long-running landslide models through basis set expansion and meta-modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(1), pages 5-22, August.
    18. Paulo, Rui & García-Donato, Gonzalo & Palomo, Jesús, 2012. "Calibration of computer models with multivariate output," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3959-3974.
    19. Jackson Samuel E. & Vernon Ian & Liu Junli & Lindsey Keith, 2020. "Understanding hormonal crosstalk in Arabidopsis root development via emulation and history matching," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 1-33, April.
    20. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, E., 2012. "Kriging in Multi-response Simulation, including a Monte Carlo Laboratory (Replaced by 2014-012)," Other publications TiSEM cf311469-5f8c-4c1e-ad4f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:34:y:2023:i:2:n:e2754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.