IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v22y2025i4p690-706.html

The ESG Backlash and the Demand for ESG Mutual Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Quinn Curtis

Abstract

The backlash to ESG investing is in full swing, with dozens of states enacting measures aimed at curtailing the consideration of environmental, social, and governance factors in their pension funds. Meanwhile, ESG mutual funds are experiencing net outflows after a period of lagging performance. Is this the end for ESG funds? This paper draws on the literature on mutual fund flows to study how the demand for ESG funds has changed over time and how that demand interacts with the political and legal backlash to ESG. It finds that ESG funds received significant positive flows, controlling for conventional predictors of fund flow, starting in 2017. This effect peaked in late 2019, much earlier than the publicly perceived decline of ESG. Abnormal investor preference for ESG funds disappeared in 2020, around the time of the Trump Department of Labor rule targeting ESG and then reappeared in 2021 before declining again. The excess demand for ESG was driven largely by institutional share classes, particularly pre‐2021. While the positive effect of ESG branding on flows has disappeared, demand for ESG funds (controlling for past performance) has generally remained non‐negative up to 2024. Most of the decline in excess demand for ESG funds predates the political backlash and state anti‐ESG laws. Tests for a causal relationship between ESG fund flows and the political backlash, as measured by mentions of ESG in conservative media and state laws restricting ESG, show no statistical connection.

Suggested Citation

  • Quinn Curtis, 2025. "The ESG Backlash and the Demand for ESG Mutual Funds," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 690-706, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:690-706
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:5:p:1589-1622 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Steven Tairu Bello & Ph.D, 2021. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Employment in Canada," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 212-226.
    3. Berk, Jonathan B. & van Binsbergen, Jules H., 2021. "The Impact of Impact Investing," Research Papers 3981, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Michael J. Cooper & Huseyin Gulen & P. Raghavendra Rau, 2005. "Changing Names with Style: Mutual Fund Name Changes and Their Effects on Fund Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(6), pages 2825-2858, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doron Avramov & Abraham Lioui & Yang Liu & Andrea Tarelli, 2025. "Dynamic ESG Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 2867-2889, April.
    2. Tiziano De Angelis & Peter Tankov & Olivier David Zerbib, 2023. "Climate Impact Investing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(12), pages 7669-7692, December.
    3. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2022. "Dissecting green returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 403-424.
    4. Habermann, Florian & Steindl, Tobias, 2025. "Stock market reactions to a sovereign wealth fund's broad-based public sustainability engagement: European evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Andrew W. Lo & Ruixun Zhang, 2024. "Quantifying the Impact of Impact Investing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(10), pages 7161-7186, October.
    6. Rami Kaplan & David L. Levy, 2025. "The Rise of Investor‐Driven Climate Governance: From Myth to Institution?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 496-510, April.
    7. Wang, Liu & Li, Shaomin, 2025. "Is corporate social responsibility a must or a plus? The role of national culture," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Huij, Joop & Laurs, Dries & van Zanten, Jan Anton, 2025. "The investment implications of sustainable investing," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Thomas Url, 2022. "Die gesamtwirtschaftliche Bedeutung der österreichischen Versicherungswirtschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 69819.
    10. Green, Daniel & Vallee, Boris, 2025. "Measurement and effects of bank exit policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Scherer, Katja & Scherer, Bernd, 2025. "ESG/Climate vs conventional indices: Their difference in climate premium," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Yan, Jingjing & Guo, Yaoqi & Wen, Fenghua, 2025. "Carbon risk and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Pierre Lavigne & Peter Tankov, 2023. "Decarbonization of financial markets: a mean-field game approach," Papers 2301.09163, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    14. Giglio, Stefano & Maggiori, Matteo & Stroebel, Johannes & Tan, Zhenhao & Utkus, Stephen & Xu, Xiao, 2025. "Four facts about ESG beliefs and investor portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Cameron Truong, 2013. "The January effect, does options trading matter?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 38(1), pages 31-48, April.
    16. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    17. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Jan Hanousek & Štěpán Jurajda, 2018. "Názvy společností a jejich vliv na výkonnost firem [Corporate Names and Performance]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(6), pages 671-688.
    19. Clemens Sialm & Hanjiang Zhang, 2020. "Tax‐Efficient Asset Management: Evidence from Equity Mutual Funds," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(2), pages 735-777, April.
    20. Cuthbertson, Keith & Nitzsche, Dirk & O'Sullivan, Niall, 2016. "A review of behavioural and management effects in mutual fund performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 162-176.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:690-706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.