IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n1616116.html

A Comparative Study of Some Point Process Models for Dynamic Networks

Author

Listed:
  • S. Haleh S. Dizaji
  • Saeid Pashazadeh
  • Javad Musevi Niya

Abstract

Modeling dynamic networks has attracted much interest in recent years, which helps understand networks’ behavior. Many works have been dedicated to modeling discrete‐time networks, but less work is done for continuous‐time networks. Point processes as powerful tools for modeling discrete events in continuous time have been widely used for modeling events over networks and their dynamics. These models have solid mathematical assumptions, making them interpretable but decreasing their generalizability for different datasets. Hence, neural point processes were introduced that don’t have strong assumptions on generative functions. However, these models can be impractical in the case of a large number of event types. This research presents a comparative study of different point process (Hawkes) models for continuous‐time networks. Furthermore, a previously introduced neural point process (neural Hawkes) model is applied for modeling network interactions. In this work, network clustering is used for specifying interaction types. These methods are compared using different synthetic and real‐world datasets, and their efficiency is evaluated on these datasets. The experiments represent that each model is appropriate for a group of datasets. In addition, the effect of clustering on results is discussed, and experiments for different clusters are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Haleh S. Dizaji & Saeid Pashazadeh & Javad Musevi Niya, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Some Point Process Models for Dynamic Networks," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1616116
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/1616116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1616116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/1616116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie Fournet & Alain Barrat, 2014. "Contact Patterns among High School Students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Patrick O. Perry & Patrick J. Wolfe, 2013. "Point process modelling for directed interaction networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(5), pages 821-849, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Bartolucci & Antonietta Mira & Stefano Peluso, 2025. "Marginal models with individual-specific effects for the analysis of longitudinal bipartite networks," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 19(4), pages 895-920, December.
    2. Nynke M. D. Niezink & Paolo Campana, 2023. "When Things Turn Sour: A Network Event Study of Organized Crime Violence," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 655-678, September.
    3. Zappa, Paola & Vu, Duy Q., 2021. "Markets as networks evolving step by step: Relational Event Models for the interbank market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    4. Cornelius Fritz & Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2020. "Tempus volat, hora fugit: A survey of tie‐oriented dynamic network models in discrete and continuous time," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 275-299, August.
    5. Mao, Tianrui & Zhang, Shilun & Hanjalic, Alan & Wang, Huijuan, 2025. "Estimating nodal spreading influence using partial temporal networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1).
    6. Mattia Mazzoli & Riccardo Gallotti & Filippo Privitera & Pere Colet & José J. Ramasco, 2023. "Spatial immunization to abate disease spreading in transportation hubs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Li, Mingwu & Dankowicz, Harry, 2019. "Impact of temporal network structures on the speed of consensus formation in opinion dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 1355-1370.
    8. Yufeng Xia & Yangkuo Li & Xiaobing Zhao & Xuan Xu, 2025. "Investigating network structures in recurrent event data with discrete observation times," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 543-573, July.
    9. Tomáš Diviák & Jürgen Lerner, 2025. "Understanding the Mechanisms that Drive Relational Events Dynamics and Structure in Corruption Networks," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 523-547, December.
    10. Mitja Steinbacher & Matthias Raddant & Fariba Karimi & Eva Camacho Cuena & Simone Alfarano & Giulia Iori & Thomas Lux, 2021. "Advances in the agent-based modeling of economic and social behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(7), pages 1-24, July.
    11. repec:plo:pone00:0131469 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Wenqin Du & Bailey K. Fosdick & Wen Zhou, 2025. "Regression Modeling of the Count Relational Data with Exchangeable Dependencies," Papers 2502.11255, arXiv.org.
    13. Masoumeh Fallahi & Reza Pourtaheri & Farzad Eskandari, 2024. "The Multivariate Generalized Linear Hawkes Process in High Dimensions with Applications in Neuroscience," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Yijun Wang & Weiwei Wang, 2021. "Quantile estimation of semiparametric model with time-varying coefficients for panel count data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Fabio Vieira & Roger Leenders & Joris Mulder, 2024. "Fast meta-analytic approximations for relational event models: applications to data streams and multilevel data," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1823-1859, October.
    16. Federica Bianchi & Francesco Bartolucci & Stefano Peluso & Antonietta Mira, 2020. "Longitudinal networks of dyadic relationships using latent trajectories: evidence from the European interbank market," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 711-739, August.
    17. Marco Tonellato & Stefano Tasselli & Guido Conaldi & Jürgen Lerner & Alessandro Lomi, 2024. "A Microstructural Approach to Self-Organizing: The Emergence of Attention Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 496-524, March.
    18. repec:plo:pone00:0153690 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Verena Bauer & Dietmar Harhoff & Göran Kauermann, 2022. "A smooth dynamic network model for patent collaboration data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(1), pages 97-116, March.
    20. Lucille Calmon & Elisabetta Colosi & Giulia Bassignana & Alain Barrat & Vittoria Colizza, 2024. "Preserving friendships in school contacts: An algorithm to construct synthetic temporal networks for epidemic modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Rauf Ahmed Shams Malick & Syed Kashir Hasan & Fahad Samad & Nadeem Kafi Khan & Hassan Jamil Syed, 2023. "Smart Methods to Deal with COVID-19 at University-Level Institutions Using Social Network Analysis Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    22. C Matias & T Rebafka & F Villers, 2018. "A semiparametric extension of the stochastic block model for longitudinal networks," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 665-680.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:1616116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.