IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v11y1994i1p381-404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Stock Market Reaction to the Reserve Quantity Disclosures of U.S. Oil and Gas Producers

Author

Listed:
  • NASSER A. SPEAR

Abstract

. The purpose of this study is to examine the information content of the components of the annual change in the quantity of proved reserves reported by U.S oil and gas (O&G) producers. In particular, it investigates the contemporaneous association between the unexpected portions of discoveries, production, net purchases, and revisions of prior quantity estimates and unexpected security returns during the release week of the 1984 to 1988 annual reports or forms 10†K of these firms. The empirical results suggest that (1) disaggregating the net change in the quantity of proved reserves into its components conveys additional information beyond that contained in the net change in total proved reserves itself, (2) discoveries are highly associated with security returns even after controlling for production, and (3) revisions, net purchases, and production have a modest influence on security returns. The findings of this study are interpreted within the context of the economic environment of the O&G industry during the test period. Résumé. L'auteur examine le contenu en information des éléments du changement annuel de la quantité de réserves prouvées dont font état les producteurs pétroliers et gaziers des États†Unis. Il s'intéresse en particulier, pour la période 1984–1988, à l'association que l'on établit maintenant entre, d'une part, la portion inattendue des découvertes, la production, les achats nets et la révision des estimations antérieures de quantité et, d'autre part, les rendements imprévus des titres au cours de la semaine de publication des rapports annuels ou des formulaires 10†K des entreprises. Les résultats empiriques donnent à penser que (1) la décomposition en ses différents éléments du changement net dans la quantité des réserves prouvées livre davantage d'information que le changement net global lui†même, (2) les découvertes sont associées de très près aux rendements des titres, même une fois contrôlée la variable production, et (3) les révisions, les achats nets et la production ont une modeste influence sur les rendements des titres. Les résultats de cette étude sont interprétés dans le contexte économique du secteur pétrolier et gazier au cours de la période d'analyse.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser A. Spear, 1994. "The Stock Market Reaction to the Reserve Quantity Disclosures of U.S. Oil and Gas Producers," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 381-404, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:11:y:1994:i:1:p:381-404
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00448.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00448.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00448.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stober, Tl, 1986. "The Incremental Information-Content Of Financial Statement Disclosures - The Case Of Lifo Inventory Liquidations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24, pages 138-160.
    2. Bernard, Vl, 1987. "Cross-Sectional Dependence And Problems In Inference In Market-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 1-48.
    3. Livingston, Miles, 1977. "Industry Movements of Common Stocks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 32(3), pages 861-874, June.
    4. Christie, Andrew A., 1987. "On cross-sectional analysis in accounting research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 231-258, December.
    5. White, Halbert, 1980. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 817-838, May.
    6. Oppong, A, 1980. "Information-Content Of Annual Earnings Announcements Revisited," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 574-584.
    7. Bell, Tb, 1983. "Market Reaction To Reserve Recognition Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ron Bird & Matthew Grosse & Danny Yeung, 2013. "The market response to exploration, resource and reserve announcements by mining companies: Australian data," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 38(2), pages 311-331, August.
    2. Sidney J. Gray & Niclas Hellman & Mariya N. Ivanova, 2019. "Extractive Industries Reporting: A Review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(1), pages 42-91, March.
    3. Cosmas Odo & Wilson Ani & Philip Obialor & David Ugwunta, 2016. "To What Extent do United Kingdom Companies Provide Oil and Gas Reserves Information Sufficient to Satisfy Statement of Recommended Practice Requirements?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(1), pages 34-44, March.
    4. Power, Sean Bradley & Cleary, Peter & Donnelly, Ray, 2017. "Accounting in the London Stock Exchange's extractive industry: The effect of policy diversity on the value relevance of exploration-related disclosures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 545-559.
    5. Marc Badia & Miguel Duro & Bjorn N. Jorgensen & Gaizka Ormazabal & Hans B. Christensen, 2020. "The Informational Effects of Tightening Oil and Gas Disclosure Rules," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1720-1755, September.
    6. Tega Anighoro, 2020. "Value relevance of the components of oil and gas reserve quantity change disclosures of upstream oil and gas companies in the london stock exchange," Papers 2005.14659, arXiv.org.
    7. Bebbington, Jan & Schneider, Thomas & Stevenson, Lorna & Fox, Alison, 2020. "Fossil fuel reserves and resources reporting and unburnable carbon: Investigating conflicting accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch, 2009. "Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3-4), pages 253-288.
    2. Keating, Elizabeth K. & Lys, Thomas Z. & Magee, Robert P., 2003. "Internet downturn: finding valuation factors in Spring 2000," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 189-236, January.
    3. Mary E. Barth & Sanjay Kallapur, 1996. "The Effects of Cross†Sectional Scale Differences on Regression Results in Empirical Accounting Research," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 527-567, September.
    4. Gary C. Biddle & Gim S. Seow & Andrew F. Siegel, 1995. "Relative versus Incremental Information Content," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Janice C. Y. How & Yion K. Phung & Peter Verhoeven, 2005. "Accuracy of Analysts' Earnings Forecasts: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions in Australia," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 1(1), pages 67-80.
    6. Peter M. Clarkson & Alex Dontoh & Gordon Richardson & Stephan E. Sefcik, 1992. "The voluntary inclusion of earnings forecasts in IPO prospectuses," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 601-616, March.
    7. Power, Sean Bradley & Cleary, Peter & Donnelly, Ray, 2017. "Accounting in the London Stock Exchange's extractive industry: The effect of policy diversity on the value relevance of exploration-related disclosures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 545-559.
    8. Begona Giner & Carmelo Reverte, 2001. "Valuation implications of capital structure: a contextual approach," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 291-314.
    9. Lipe, Robert C. & Bryant, Lisa & Widener, Sally K., 1998. "Do nonlinearity, firm-specific coefficients, and losses represent distinct factors in the relation between stock returns and accounting earnings?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 195-214, May.
    10. Core, John E. & Schrand, Catherine M., 1999. "The effect of accounting-based debt covenants on equity valuation1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-34, February.
    11. Thomas Schleicher & Martin Walker, 1999. "Share price anticipation of earnings and management's discussion of operations and financing," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 321-335.
    12. Ayers, Benjamin & Freeman, Robert N., 1997. "Market assessment of industry and firm earnings information," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 205-218, December.
    13. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    14. Byung T. Ro, 1989. "Earnings news and the firm size effect," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 177-195, September.
    15. Susan M. Albring & María T. Cabán‐García & Jacqueline L. Reck, 2010. "The value relevance of a non‐GAAP performance metric to the capital markets," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 264-284, August.
    16. Harris, Mary S. & Muller III, Karl A., 1999. "The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 285-312, January.
    17. Berry, Kevin T. & Hasan, Tanweer & O'Bryan, David, 1998. "Relative information content of proven reserves: The BOEs-revenue versus BOEs-energy," Journal of Energy Finance & Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-11.
    18. Jill L. Wetmore & John R. Brick, 1994. "Commercial Bank Risk: Market, Interest Rate, And Foreign Exchange," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 17(4), pages 585-596, December.
    19. Yadav, Pradeep K., 1992. "Event studies based on volatility of returns and trading volume: A review," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 157-184.
    20. Fargher, Neil & Wee, Marvin, 2019. "The impact of Ball and Brown (1968) on generations of research," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 55-72.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:11:y:1994:i:1:p:381-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.