Does European Union Environmental Policy Pass a Costâ€“Benefit Test?
Most European Union countries are committed to some form of regulatory impact assessment, and in some cases these assessments involve the formal use of costâ€“benefit analysis. The European Treaty of Union also calls for a comparison of costs and benefits for all European regulations. Despite this, only a limited number of regulations have been subject to costâ€“benefit analysis. Using a variety of sources, this paper investigates whether or not a selection of major environmental regulations would pass a costâ€“benefit test. The general answer is that, while some do, most do not. This finding has major implications for the efficiency of European environmental legislation, and reflects on the willingness of Member States to sign up to inefficient regulation.
Volume (Year): 5 (2004)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wej:wldecn:183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ed Jones)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.