IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jecman/v46y2024i1p246-273n1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of decision-making factors of hybrid and emission-free heat source users in single-family houses

Author

Listed:
  • Nadolny Michał

    (Department of Process Management, Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Walaszczyk Ewa

    (Department of Process Management, Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Walerysiak Sebastian

    (Department of Process Management, Faculty of Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Aim/purpose – Energy is traditionally produced using fossil fuels as raw materials, which impacts the environment negatively. Due to the scarcity of fossil fuel supplies, rising prices of energy carriers, and global trends, consumers are turning to renewable energy sources (RES) for home heating. The aim of this study was to determine whether the choice of house heating system using different sources than fossil fuels is driven by any additional components of single-family house users’ purchasing decisions besides cost. Based on research results, the prospects for further transformation of thermal energy in single-family housing in Poland towards RES were determined. Design/methodology/approach – The research on the inhabitants of single-family houses was conducted in December 2022 in Poland. The research method used was a survey using the CATI and CAWI techniques. 600 respondents filled out the questionnaire. The results were statistically analyzed. A non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test (non--parametric ANOVA) and a post-hoc test were used. The distributions’ normality and the variances’ homogeneity were measured using Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Brownian– –Forsythe tests. Calculations were performed using Statistica software. Findings – The choice of heating energy source in single-family houses, taking CO2 emissions into account, is not dictated by income level. Instead, it is determined by the number of people in the household. More numerous households opt for a zero-emission heat source. Households using emission-based heating energy sources are significantly more driven by the cost of using heating appliances; their purchase price, reliability, and product quality are more important than those using zero-emission methods. The partial use of renewable energy source solutions promotes further investment in emission-free heat sources. Research implications/limitations – The analysis illustrates the state of thermal transformation in single-family houses during the energy transition process at the national level. A limitation of the research is that it samples only one EU country struggling with too high CO2 emissions compared to other countries. Originality/value/contribution – A unique approach used in this study is to address the variation in incentives for renewable energy purchasing decisions, considering CO2 emissions. This aspect, although noticeable to some extent, is not directly taken into account by users who do not have the tools to assess their CO2 emissions. However, the proposed research approach showed that the CO2 emission level of a heating system is a factor differentiating some aspects of the decision-making process of system users. In particular, it showed what elements of the decision are essential in households that have not yet taken any action towards energy transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadolny Michał & Walaszczyk Ewa & Walerysiak Sebastian, 2024. "Comparative analysis of decision-making factors of hybrid and emission-free heat source users in single-family houses," Journal of Economics and Management, Sciendo, vol. 46(1), pages 246-273.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:246-273:n:1010
    DOI: 10.22367/jem.2024.46.10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22367/jem.2024.46.10
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22367/jem.2024.46.10?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sławomir Stec & Elżbieta Jadwiga Szymańska & Jolanta Stec-Rusiecka & Jolanta Puacz-Olszewska, 2023. "Transformation of the Polish Heating Sector Based on an Example of Select Heat Energy Companies Supplying Energy to Local Government Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-33, November.
    2. Kaya, O. & Klepacka, A.M. & Florkowski, W.J., 2021. "The role of personal and environmental factors in rural homeowner decision to insulate; an example from Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhatova, A. & Derkenbaeva, E. & van Leeuwen, E. & Kranzl, L. & Halleck Vega, S. & Hofstede, G.J., 2024. "Who invests in energy retrofits? Mining Dutch homeowners’ data," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Wojciech J. Florkowski & Joanna Rakowska, 2022. "Review of Regional Renewable Energy Investment Projects: The Example of EU Cohesion Funds Dispersal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    energy; decision-making process; heat source; hybrid heat sources; emission-free heat sources; consumers’ characteristics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jecman:v:46:y:2024:i:1:p:246-273:n:1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.