IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/hjobpa/v16y2025i1p89-102n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Level of Public Trust: Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Gbarnga, Bong County, Liberia

Author

Listed:
  • Lawor Martin J.

    (College of Public Affairs University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines)

  • Querijero Nelson Jose Vincent B.

    (College of Public Affairs University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines)

  • Atienza Vella A.

    (College of Public Affairs University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines)

  • Cortes Damcelle T.

    (College of Public Affairs University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines)

Abstract

The study evaluated public trust in the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Gbarnga City, Bong County, Liberia. It explored community perceptions and the factors influencing procedural and substantive justice trust. Trust reflects the belief in an institution's competence and effectiveness in achieving its goals. Interviews were conducted with 96 randomly selected community members. Data were analyzed descriptively, along with measurement of satisfaction levels of the citizens on the performance of the Ninth Judicial Court in the provision of procedural and substantive justice using a five-point Likert scale. Trust was assessed on an 11-point scale (0 - no trust, 10 - complete trust). The determinants of trust were identified by correlating mean satisfaction ratings with respondents' trust levels. Additional factors like prior court experience and trusting attitudes were also examined. Results showed weak to moderate correlations. Most respondents were male, single, aged 31-40, and fairly educated, with 43 percent having filed a court case. Ratings for responsiveness, integrity, and fairness leaned towards dissatisfaction, while reliability and openness received neutral to satisfied ratings for both procedural and substantive justice. Overall trust was moderate (5.20 out of 10). The study recommended measures to enhance public trust in the 9th Judicial Circuit Court.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawor Martin J. & Querijero Nelson Jose Vincent B. & Atienza Vella A. & Cortes Damcelle T., 2025. "Assessing the Level of Public Trust: Ninth Judicial Circuit Court in Gbarnga, Bong County, Liberia," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 89-102.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:89-102:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/hjbpa-2025-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2025-0006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/hjbpa-2025-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roussey, Ludivine & Deffains, Bruno, 2012. "Trust in judicial institutions: an empirical approach," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 351-369, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roussey, Ludivine & Soubeyran, Raphael, 2018. "Overburdened judges," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Palmisano, Flaviana & Sacchi, Agnese, 2024. "Trust in public institutions, inequality, and digital interaction: Empirical evidence from European Union countries," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Pedro C. Magalhães & Nuno Garoupa, 2020. "Judicial Performance and Trust in Legal Systems: Findings from a Decade of Surveys in over 20 European Countries," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1743-1760, September.
    4. Bielen, Samantha & Peeters, Ludo & Marneffe, Wim & Vereeck, Lode, 2018. "Backlogs and litigation rates: Testing congestion equilibrium across European judiciaries," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 9-22.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:16:y:2025:i:1:p:89-102:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.