IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/finprj/v1y2015i1p22-32n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Just How Safe are ‘Safe Withdrawal Rates’ in Retirement?

Author

Listed:
  • Drew Michael E.

    (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

  • Walk Adam N.

    (Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)

Abstract

This study considers one of the cornerstone questions in the retirement income debate; namely, what’s a safe withdrawal rate for retirement? This question is of particular importance to Australia’s superannuation system, which is characterised by having compulsory contributions during the retirement saving (or accumulation) phase, but no compulsory requirement to annuitise lump sums at the commencement of the retirement income (or distribution/decumulation) phase. As a result, many retirees face a classic asset–liability mismatch, the need to fund relatively short- and medium-term retirement spending needs with a long-term investment strategy. This study tests one of the most popular heuristics that have arisen from the safe withdrawal debate, specifically the 4% rule. Our findings question the validity of this approach using historical international return data.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:22-32:n:1002
DOI: 10.2478/fprj-2015-0002
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/fprj-2015-0002
Download Restriction: no
File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fprj-2015-0002?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

Account based pensions; four percent rule; retirement income;
All these keywords.

JEL classification:

  • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
  • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:22-32:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.