IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/udc/esteco/v36y2009i2p217-241.html

Planes Mínimos Obligatorios en Mercados de Seguros de Salud Segmentados

Author

Listed:
  • Edmundo Beteta
  • Manuel Willington

Abstract

Se analiza el efecto de la introducción de un plan mínimo obligatorio de prestaciones (PMO) en un mercado de seguros de salud segmentado en que el seguro público y las aseguradoras privadas atienden respectivamente a riesgos altos y bajos (la segmentación es obtenida de manera endógena en el modelo). El análisis se realiza en un contexto en que ambos tipos de aseguradores deben ofrecer el PMO y los asegurados tienen una obligación de asegurarse y contribuir una prima mínima. Al comparar los equilibrios pre y post introducción del PMO, se constata que la reforma introduce indirectamente un mecanismo de subsidios implícitos que otorgan cierta solidaridad al sistema, aun cuando la reforma no lo promueva de manera explícita mediante mecanismos de compensación de riesgos. Para que este mecanismo de subsidio implícito opere es imprescindible que se regulen tanto el precio como la calidad asociados al PMO y que el regulador tenga la capacidad de coerción para que las aseguradoras privadas efectivamente ofrezcan el PMO a todos los tipos de asegurados.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmundo Beteta & Manuel Willington, 2009. "Planes Mínimos Obligatorios en Mercados de Seguros de Salud Segmentados," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 36(2 Year 20), pages 217-241, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:217-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/8f3ecf66152c7491fd0f7038931134b745f0b9a2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willington Manuel & Alegría Alexander, 2012. "Collusion in a One-Period Insurance Market with Adverse Selection," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:36:y:2009:i:2:p:217-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Verónica Kunze (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.