IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/renvpo/doi10.1086-725250.html

The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Raimi
  • Emily Grubert
  • Jake Higdon
  • Gilbert Metcalf
  • Sophie Pesek
  • Devyani Singh

Abstract

The need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions requires curtailing coal, oil, and natural gas production and consumption. However, these fuels are major revenue sources for governments. Here, we develop a novel estimate of the revenues generated by fossil fuels for all governments in the United States. Then we estimate how those revenues change under three stylized scenarios through 2050. The first is business as usual (BAU), without further controlling emissions. The second is to limit the increase in global average temperature to 2°C. The third and most ambitious climate goal is to limit the increase to 1.5°C. We estimate that fossil fuels generate $138 billion annually for US governments. Although revenues decline under all three scenarios, they fall more quickly under the ambitious climate policy. Taxes on refined petroleum products are the largest source of revenue and decline under all scenarios. Oil and gas production is the second largest and is relatively stable under the BAU and 2°C scenarios but declines rapidly under the 1.5°C scenario. Under all scenarios, coal revenues decline rapidly, approaching zero by 2040 under the 1.5°C and 2°C scenarios. These revenue shortfalls will be concentrated in certain regions. At the same time, recent estimates of climate damages easily exceed the revenue losses described in this analysis. This highlights the need for policy makers to adopt emissions-reduction strategies and also address revenue shortfalls. The policy tools to accomplish both goals are relatively straightforward. However, implementing them will require overcoming considerable political challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Raimi & Emily Grubert & Jake Higdon & Gilbert Metcalf & Sophie Pesek & Devyani Singh, 2023. "The Fiscal Implications of the US Transition Away from Fossil Fuels," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(2), pages 295-315.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/725250
    DOI: 10.1086/725250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725250
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/725250
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/725250?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. Jason Jolley & Clara Bone & Hunter Bacot & Tuyen Pham, 2024. "Navigating occupational digitalization via skillshed analysis," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(3), pages 631-645, May.
    2. Boyd, James & Joiner, Emily & Krupnick, Alan & Toman, Michael A., 2024. "Policy Incentives to Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Analysis and Recommendations," RFF Reports 24-03, Resources for the Future.
    3. Semieniuk, Gregor & Weber, Isabella M. & Weaver, Iain S. & Wasner, Evan & Braun, Benjamin & Holden, Philip B. & Salas, Pablo & Mercure, Jean-Francois & Edwards, Neil R., 2025. "Best of times, worst of times: record fossil-fuel profits, inflation and inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 129170, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Ian Njuguna & Ward Lyles & Uma Outka & Elise Harrington & Fayola Jacobs & Nadia Ahmad, 2025. "Navigating Headwinds in the Green Energy Transition: Explaining Variations in Local-Level Wind Energy Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-27, October.
    5. Godby, Robert & Cook, Benjamin & Holland, Morgan & Kjorstad, Tyler, 2025. "State incentives: Impact on wind energy costs and policy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:renvpo:doi:10.1086/725250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/REEP .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.