IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/v72y1964p211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Empirical Tests of Monetary Management and of Rules versus Discretion

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Modigliani

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Modigliani, 1964. "Some Empirical Tests of Monetary Management and of Rules versus Discretion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 211-211.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:72:y:1964:p:211
    DOI: 10.1086/258903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/258903
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/258903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franco Modigliani, 1988. "The Monetarist Controversy Revisited," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 6(4), pages 3-18, October.
    2. Michael D. Bordo & Anna J. Schwartz, 1987. "The Importance of Stable Money: Theory and Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: Money in Historical Perspective, pages 255-270, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Thomas Mayer, 1987. "Replacing The Fomc By A Pc," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 5(2), pages 31-43, April.
    4. Perry Mehrling, 2013. "MIT and Money," GREDEG Working Papers 2013-44, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. Thakor, Anjan & Boot, Arnoud, 2003. "The Economic Value of Flexibility When There is Disagreement," CEPR Discussion Papers 3709, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:72:y:1964:p:211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.