IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/doi10.1086-734779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Uncertainty in the Market for Coal Electricity: The Case of Air Toxics Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Gautam Gowrisankaran
  • Ashley Langer
  • Wendan Zhang

Abstract

Government policy uncertainty affects irreversible decisions including technology adoption and exit. This paper quantifies uncertainty surrounding the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). We estimate a dynamic oligopoly model for coal-fired electricity generators that recovers generators’ beliefs regarding future MATS enforcement. We develop the approximate belief oligopoly equilibrium concept, where players understand that their decisions impact aggregate market states. MATS enforcement created substantial uncertainty: the perceived enforcement probability dropped to 43%. Resolving uncertainty early would increase profits by $1.39 billion but also increase pollution costs by $0.652–$1.776 billion. Had exit been unlikely, resolving uncertainty early would have decreased pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Gautam Gowrisankaran & Ashley Langer & Wendan Zhang, 2025. "Policy Uncertainty in the Market for Coal Electricity: The Case of Air Toxics Standards," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(6), pages 1757-1795.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/734779
    DOI: 10.1086/734779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734779
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734779
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/734779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.