IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/doi10.1086-734134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambulance Taxis: The Impact of Regulation and Litigation on Health-Care Fraud

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Eliason
  • Riley League
  • Jetson Leder-Luis
  • Ryan C. McDevitt
  • James W. Roberts

Abstract

We study the effectiveness of pay-and-chase lawsuits and up-front regulations for combating health-care fraud. Between 2003 and 2017, Medicare spent $7.7 billion on 37.5 million regularly scheduled ambulance rides for patients traveling to and from dialysis facilities even though many did not satisfy Medicare’s criteria for receiving reimbursements. Using an identification strategy based on the staggered timing of regulations and lawsuits across the United States, we find that adding a prior authorization requirement for ambulance reimbursements reduced spending much more than pursuing criminal and civil litigation did on their own. We find no evidence that prior authorization affected patients’ health.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Eliason & Riley League & Jetson Leder-Luis & Ryan C. McDevitt & James W. Roberts, 2025. "Ambulance Taxis: The Impact of Regulation and Litigation on Health-Care Fraud," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(5), pages 1661-1702.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/734134
    DOI: 10.1086/734134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734134
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/734134
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/734134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:doi:10.1086/734134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.