IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-713188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real Men Don’t Buy “Mrs. Clean”: Gender Bias in Gendered Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Spielmann
  • Susan Dobscha
  • Tina M. Lowrey

Abstract

Our article examines how products are valued differently depending on if the product has a male or female brand representation and if the consumer is male or female. This research extends previous research that categorizes brands as “gendered” (masculine vs. feminine) using stereotypical gender representations (“soft” vs. “hard”) by showing that male and female brand names are evaluated with a bias that favors male brands. Across five studies (online, field), using a mixed-method approach (implicit association test [IAT], experiments, sales data), we examine gender-neutral product categories (champagne, chips, tea, board games) that have male or female brand representations. We find that men devalue brands with female names, whereas women made no such distinctions, which we explain is due to gender bias created by the “precarious manhood” principle. This bias by men can be overcome using agentic brand descriptions. This research has implications for brand management, marketing communications, and public policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Spielmann & Susan Dobscha & Tina M. Lowrey, 2021. "Real Men Don’t Buy “Mrs. Clean”: Gender Bias in Gendered Brands," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(2), pages 211-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/713188
    DOI: 10.1086/713188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/713188
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/713188
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/713188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/713188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.