IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucm/padeur/v38y2025pe104955.html

IED, tecnología y upgrading: repensar la política de innovación en América Latina
[FDI, Technology, and Upgrading: Rethinking Innovation Policy in Latin America]

Author

Listed:
  • Franklin Moya

    (Universidad Complutense de Madrid e Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI))

  • Katherin Pinzón

    (Universidad Complutense de Madrid e Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI))

Abstract

La relación entre inversión extranjera directa (IED), digitalización y cadenas globales de valor (CGV) se ha entendido tradicionalmente como un proceso interdependiente. Este trabajo propone una ruta para América Latina basada en una IED que transfiera conocimiento y fortalezca capacidades tecnológicas locales, superando dinámicas de dependencia. Este enfoque puede facilitar una inserción más productiva en las CGV a través de la ventana de oportunidad que se abre con las nuevas tecnologías digitales. Además, se analizan elementos clave para la política de innovación, destacando el acceso y uso de tecnologías digitales como factores críticos para la productividad y el upgrading.

Suggested Citation

  • Franklin Moya & Katherin Pinzón, 2025. "IED, tecnología y upgrading: repensar la política de innovación en América Latina [FDI, Technology, and Upgrading: Rethinking Innovation Policy in Latin America]," Papeles de Europa, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI), vol. 38, pages 104955-1049.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucm:padeur:v:38:y:2025:p:e104955
    DOI: 10.5209/pade.104955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/134069
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5209/pade.104955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamilia Loukil, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investment And Technological Innovation In Developing Countries," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 31-40, September.
    2. repec:oup:scippl:v:45:y:2018:i:3:p:293-308. is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Richard R. Nelson & Sidney G. Winter, 2002. "Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 23-46, Spring.
    4. K. J. Arrow, 1971. "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: F. H. Hahn (ed.), Readings in the Theory of Growth, chapter 11, pages 131-149, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988.
    6. Ocampo, José Antonio, 2020. "La crisis del COVID-19 de América Latina con una perspectiva histórica," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dosi, Giovanni & Nelson, Richard R., 2010. "Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 51-127, Elsevier.
    2. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    3. Michael Peneder & Karl Aiginger & Gernot Hutschenreiter & Markus Marterbauer, 2001. "Structural Change and Economic Growth," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 20668.
    4. Cristiana Mammana & Mauro Galleati, 1993. "Disequilibrium models due to a “learning by doing” process," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 16(2), pages 59-76, September.
    5. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Xiangzheng Deng & Zhan Wang & Chunhong Zhao, 2016. "Economic Evolution In China Ecologically Fragile Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 552-576, July.
    6. Giorgio Fagiolo & Daniele Giachini & Andrea Roventini, 2020. "Innovation, finance, and economic growth: an agent-based approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(3), pages 703-736, July.
    7. Juan Eduardo Chica & Carlos Marmolejo, 2016. "Knowledge economy and metropolitan growth: Barcelona and Helsinki metropolitan areas as case studies," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 22-42.
    8. Grafström, Jonas, 2021. "Ratio Working Paper No. 351: Knowledge Spillovers in the Solar energy sector," Ratio Working Papers 351, The Ratio Institute.
    9. Jang-Sup SHIN & Sung-Won JANG, 2005. "Creating First-Mover Advantages : The Case of Samsung Electronics," Development Economics Working Papers 22575, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    10. repec:osf:thesis:7zprk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Betul Gur, 2020. "The Effect of Foreign Trade on Innovation: The Case of Brics-T Countries," EconWorld Working Papers 20003, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, revised May 2020.
    12. Carlaw, Kenneth I. & Bridgett, Gregory, 2026. "A structural-evolutionary rationale for public support of private technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    13. Grafström, Jonas, 2025. "Vertical industrial policy: principles, practice and potential," Ratio Working Papers 384, The Ratio Institute.
    14. Hollanders, Hugo & Weel, Bas ter, 1999. "Skill-Biased Technical Change: On Endogenous Growth, Wage Inequality and Government Intervention," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    15. Sandra Silva, 2009. "On evolutionary technological change and economic growth: Lakatos as a starting point for appraisal," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 111-135, February.
    16. Gual, Miguel A. & Norgaard, Richard B., 2010. "Bridging ecological and social systems coevolution: A review and proposal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 707-717, February.
    17. Stolpe, Michael, 1995. "Technology and the dynamics of specialization in open economies," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 738, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    18. Fulvio Castellacci, 2007. "Evolutionary And New Growth Theories. Are They Converging?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 585-627, July.
    19. Alhusen, Harm & Bennat, Tatjana & Bizer, Kilian & Cantner, Uwe & Horstmann, Elaine & Kalthaus, Martin & Proeger, Till & Sternberg, Rolf G. & Töpfer, Stefan, 2019. "Measuring the "doing-using-interacting mode" of innovation in SMEs - A qualitative approach," ifh Working Papers 23/2019, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    20. Geoffrey Hodgson & Kainan Huang, 2012. "Evolutionary game theory and evolutionary economics: are they different species?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 345-366, April.
    21. Cantner, Uwe & Graf, Holger & Herrmann, Johannes & Kalthaus, Martin, 2016. "Inventor networks in renewable energies: The influence of the policy mix in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1165-1184.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucm:padeur:v:38:y:2025:p:e104955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Águeda González Abad (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feucmes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.