IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v18y2023i4p597-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaining, Losing, and Regaining Merit-based Scholarships

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Ribar

    (Department of Economics and Georgia Policy Labs Georgia State University and IZA Atlanta, GA, 30302)

  • Ross Rubenstein

    (Department of Public Management and Policy and Georgia Policy Labs Georgia State University Atlanta, GA, 30302)

Abstract

Georgia offers two merit-based scholarships to in-state college students: HOPE Scholarships, which provide partial tuition support, and Zell Miller Scholarships, which provide full tuition support but with stricter eligibility and retention conditions. Studies have examined retention of these scholarships but not other dynamics, including gaining HOPE Scholarships if students enter without them and follow-on transitions after students initially lose or gain a scholarship. This study uses Fall 2013 to Spring 2019 administrative data from 26 University System of Georgia institutions to estimate multivariate hazard models of (a) losing an entering Zell Miller Scholarship, (b) losing an entering HOPE Scholarship, (c) gaining a HOPE Scholarship after matriculating without one, (d) regaining a scholarship, and (e) losing a non-entering scholarship. Many students change their scholarship status—hazard analyses predict that 25 percent of entering Zell Miller Scholarship students lose their scholarships by their 90th credit hour, 42 percent of entering HOPE Scholarship students lose their scholarship by their 90th credit hour, and 27 percent of students who enter without a scholarship gain one. Students of color, students with economic disadvantages, and men are more likely to lose scholarships and less likely to gain scholarships. These dynamics compound inequalities in initial scholarship receipt.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Ribar & Ross Rubenstein, 2023. "Gaining, Losing, and Regaining Merit-based Scholarships," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 18(4), pages 597-622, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:4:p:597-622
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00385
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:18:y:2023:i:4:p:597-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.