IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v8y2020i1p117-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking practices among single sex boarding secondary schools in Western Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Amunga

    (Department of Educational Foundations, Psychology and Management Faculty of Education and Social Sciences Kaimosi Friends University College, Kenya)

Abstract

This study investigated benchmarking practices by single sex boarding secondary schools in the Western region of Kenya. The purpose was to establish why these schools engaged in benchmarking, whether they prioritised different or common benchmarking activities, and the factors militating against benchmarking. The study was guided by the theory of the learning organization. The target was 66 (37 Boys boarding and 29 Girls boarding schools, previously classified as provincial schools) engaged in benchmarking at the time of the study. A total of 20 schools representing 30% were randomly selected. Of the 240 who formed the study sample (20 principals, 20 DOSs, 100 HODs and 100 teachers) 215 (89.58%) responded. Data were collected using questionnaires with closed and open ended items, and analysed both descriptively (means and percentages) and inferentially (Chi-square and Z-test) using the Predictive Analytical Software (PASW) Version 19.0. All responses on the open ended questions were paraphrased and others reported verbatim in triangulation of findings. The study found that, schools benchmarked national and county schools. Most of the programmes benchmarked were targeted improvement in academic performance. Both categories of schools had common benchmarking interests and therefore sought information on similar practices and programmes. While most respondents reported it the practice had improved examination results, a number of challenges were pointed out. These were lack of time, lack of resources, too much focus on exams and poor implementation of benchmarked programmes. It was therefore recommended that, schools create ample time for the exercise, allocate sufficient resources for implementation of programmes and go beyond the focus on academics to benchmark on other practices that build an all round student.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Amunga, 2020. "Benchmarking practices among single sex boarding secondary schools in Western Kenya," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 117-131, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:117-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/782/261
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moise Ioan Achim & Lucia Căbulea & Maria Popa & Silvia - Ştefania Mihalache, 2009. "On The Role Of Benchmarking In The Higher Education Quality Assessment," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(11), pages 1-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Wieczorek-Szymańska, 2020. "Gender Diversity in Academic Sector—Case Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Benchmarking; Single sex; practices; militating and academic performance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:117-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.