IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/bseaps/v3y2012i1p5-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical dilemmas in the practice of the psychologist

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea Adrian Marica

    (Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology)

  • Angelica Lambru

    (Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychologyand Educational Sciences)

Abstract

The psychologist encounters himself many times in situation which needs a special attention and a good analysis before he can decide which action is most adequate for all the parties concerned. Once psychology became a profession ethic codes were developed. These codes have the purpose to guide and offer the psychologist the support he needs in his practice. Ethic codes are based on some principles, which number can vary from country to country, but they are general rules which are aspirational in nature. However, simply knowing the ethical codes is not enough and it does not exclude the possibility for the psychologist to enter himself in an ethical dilemma concerning his work. There are psychologists, whom are more likely to have a less ethical behavior in their practice, but there are some aspects in their work that present more conflicts and are truly dilemmatic. Researches show that more often the psychologists meet the following dilemmas: confidentiality, multiple relations, sexual relations, cooperation with other professionals. The ability to think critically and to analyze all the aspects of that situation and apply general ethical principles is vital. All practitioners should therefore know the ethical codes of their specialty, be aware of consequences for their actions that are not sanctioned by their organization, and seek consultation when they are in doubt.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea Adrian Marica & Angelica Lambru, 2012. "Ethical dilemmas in the practice of the psychologist," BlackSea Journal of Psychology, Ovidius University of Constanta, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, vol. 3(1), pages 5-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:bseaps:v:3:y:2012:i:1:p:5-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bspsychology.ro/index.php/BSJoP/article/view/64/61
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bspsychology.ro/index.php/BSJoP/article/view/64
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ethics; ethical dilemmas; psychologist practice; ethical principles;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:bseaps:v:3:y:2012:i:1:p:5-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanase Tasente (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.