IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v51y2019i11p1236-1250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An extended generalized TODIM for risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes considering risk indicators interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Weizhong Wang
  • Xinwang Liu
  • Jindong Qin
  • Shuli Liu

Abstract

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) is considered as a proactive risk prevention and control technique that has been widely applied to identify, assess and eliminate the risk of failure modes in various fields. Nevertheless, the interactions between risk indicators and decision maker’s psychological behavior characteristics are seldom considered simultaneously in the current FMEA method. In this article, we develop a hybrid FMEA framework integrating generalized TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of Interactive and Multi-criteria Decision Making) method, Choquet integral and Shapley index to remedy this gap. In the proposed FMEA framework, fuzzy measures and Shapley index are used to model the interaction relationships among risk indicators and to determine the weights of these indicators. The extended generalized TODIM method with fuzzy measure and Shapley index is presented to simulate the psychological behavior characteristics of FMEA team members. It is also applied to calculate the risk priority of each failure mode. Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers (TrFNs) are adopted to depict the uncertainty in the risk evaluation process. Furthermore, a new risk evaluation information fusion with TrFNs-WAIA (weighted arithmetic interaction averaging operator of the trapezoidal fuzzy numbers) operator based on λ−Shapley Choquet is developed to aggregate individual risk evaluation information of FMEA team member into a group risk evaluation matrix, which considers the potential correlations among these members. Finally, a practical example of FMEA problem is presented to demonstrate the application and feasibility of the proposed hybrid FMEA framework, and comparison and sensitivity studies are also conducted to validate the effectiveness of the improved FMEA approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Weizhong Wang & Xinwang Liu & Jindong Qin & Shuli Liu, 2019. "An extended generalized TODIM for risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes considering risk indicators interaction," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1236-1250, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:51:y:2019:i:11:p:1236-1250
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2018.1539889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2018.1539889
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2018.1539889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Xiao & Xiuli Wang & Hengjie Zhang, 2022. "Exploring the Ordinal Classifications of Failure Modes in the Reliability Management: An Optimization-Based Consensus Model with Bounded Confidences," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 49-80, February.
    2. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Song, Wenyan, 2022. "Identifying critical factors in systems with interrelated components: A method considering heterogeneous influence and strength attenuation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 456-470.
    3. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:51:y:2019:i:11:p:1236-1250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.