IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v53y2015i24p7465-7487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duty and workstation rostering considering preferences and fairness: a case study at a department of anaesthesiology

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Fügener
  • Jens O. Brunner
  • Armin Podtschaske

Abstract

This research addresses a personnel scheduling problem at hospitals. We present two mixed integer linear programming models -- a duty-roster model and a workstation-roster model. The duty-roster model determines the assignment of physicians to 24-h and late duties whereas the workstation-roster model assigns physicians to actual workstations as operating rooms. The former serves as an input for the latter. In both models, we maximise the number of assignments subject to labour regulations and internal department-specific scheduling rules. Furthermore, we consider experience levels and qualifications in our models. To promote for job satisfaction, we take into account fairness aspects as well as individual physician preferences. Using real-world data from our cooperating department of anaesthesiology with 120 physicians, we set up a case study. Computational results indicate the superior quality compared to manual scheduling which is currently in use at our cooperation hospital. Furthermore, we develop an extensive computational study with 5800 instances to test the models. We show that the computational burden is negligible and we derive managerial insight for the scheduling process.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Fügener & Jens O. Brunner & Armin Podtschaske, 2015. "Duty and workstation rostering considering preferences and fairness: a case study at a department of anaesthesiology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7465-7487, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:24:p:7465-7487
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1082667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2015.1082667
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2015.1082667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Rea & Craig Froehle & Suzanne Masterson & Brian Stettler & Gregory Fermann & Arthur Pancioli, 2021. "Unequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2304-2320, July.
    2. Damcı-Kurt, Pelin & Zhang, Minjiao & Marentay, Brian & Govind, Nirmal, 2019. "Improving physician schedules by leveraging equalization: Cases from hospitals in U.S," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 182-193.
    3. Wolbeck, Lena Antonia, 2019. "Fairness aspects in personnel scheduling," Discussion Papers 2019/16, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    4. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Kraul, Sebastian & Brunner, Jens O., 2023. "Stable annual scheduling of medical residents using prioritized multiple training schedules to combat operational uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1263-1278.
    6. Fügener, Andreas & Pahr, Alexander & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "Mid-term nurse rostering considering cross-training effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 176-187.
    7. Erhard, Melanie & Schoenfelder, Jan & Fügener, Andreas & Brunner, Jens O., 2018. "State of the art in physician scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:53:y:2015:i:24:p:7465-7487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.