IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v41y2021i3-4p200-222.html

A transformative approach to corporate social responsibility: an antidote to corporate hypocrisy

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Losada-Otálora
  • Linda Alkire (née Nasr)

Abstract

Despite the substantial budgets spent on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), customers’ reactions toward companies’ socially responsible strategies are not always in line with companies’ goals. This is mainly due to the rising CSR-related-hypocrisy occurring as a customer response to a common concern that companies are investing in symbolic CSR. These perceptions not only limit the sought-after outcomes of CSR but could result in a worsening of reputation and financial loss for services. As such, the key research question in this paper is: ‘From a customers’ perspective, what factors can help reduce the perception of CSR-related-hypocrisy within banking services?’. In addressing this question, this paper adopts a transdisciplinary approach bridging the gap between CSR and Transformative Service Research (TSR) literature. Findings suggest that when CSR-related-activities positively affect the wellbeing of customers, it is less likely that they judge a firm CSR activity as a hypocrite. In the retail banking sector, this paper shows higher perceived bank information transparency results in lower levels of perceived CSR-related-hypocrisy, especially when CSR activities improve the financial self-efficacy of customers. By bridging TSR and CSR lenses, this paper posits CSR activities offer service companies a unique opportunity for creating ‘uplifting changes’ in the life of customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Losada-Otálora & Linda Alkire (née Nasr), 2021. "A transformative approach to corporate social responsibility: an antidote to corporate hypocrisy," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3-4), pages 200-222, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:3-4:p:200-222
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2019.1655000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069.2019.1655000
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069.2019.1655000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laila Maswadi & Azlan Amran, 2023. "Does board capital enhance corporate social responsibility disclosure quality? The role of CEO power," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 209-225, January.
    2. Abhishek Sharma & Chandana Hewege & Chamila Perera, 2022. "Violations of CSR Practices in the Australian Financial Industry: How Is the Decision-Making Power of Australian Women Implicated?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    3. M. Kabir Hassan & Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Jennifer Brodmann & Abu Bashar & Himani Grewal, 2023. "Bibliometric and Scientometric analysis on CSR practices in the banking sector," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 177-196, April.
    4. Pragya Gupta & Sonali Singh & Laura Broccardo & Ebtesam Abdullah Alzeiby, 2025. "Examining the link between CSR perceptions and employee advocacy through organizational justice: Can corporate hypocrisy mitigate?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 615-634, January.
    5. Maria Jose Murcia & Maria Dolores del Rio & Maria Carmela Annosi, 2025. "The Procession Goes Inside: Employees' Dissonance Reduction Strategies in Response to Corporate Hypocrisy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 6106-6119, September.
    6. Yiming Wang & Yuhua Xie & Mingwei Liu & Yongxing Guo & Duojun He, 2024. "Silent Majority: How Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Hypocrisy are Related to their Silence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(2), pages 315-334, November.
    7. Jintao Lu & Chunyan Wang & Dima Jamali & Yangyang Gao & Chong Zhang & Mengshang Liang, 2022. "A novel framework to unearth corporate hypocrisy: Connotation, formation mechanism, manifestation, and contagion effect," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1136-1156, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:41:y:2021:i:3-4:p:200-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.