IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/seaccj/v38y2018i1p19-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Schaltegger

Abstract

Environmental management accounting (EMA) is an innovative management accounting approach that covers a large range of tools with the purpose to support different actors in environmentally beneficial decision-making in companies. While the existing literature has been systematised and many EMA tools and case study applications have been discussed in depth, the links to sustainability are mostly rather assumed than explicitly discussed. This article addresses links and missing links between EMA and ecological aspects of sustainability. As its name reveals, EMA focuses on issues of the natural environment. It would thus be inappropriate to harshly criticise missing explicit links to social issues and other non-environmental aspects of sustainability (e.g. as proposed by the UN sustainable development goals). The question, however, remains whether and how exactly EMA links or could be linked to global ecological issues of sustainability. This paper therefore examines EMA links to global environmental issues based on the concept of planetary boundaries as it covers key ecological issues of global sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 19-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:19-29
    DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1395351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1395351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0969160X.2017.1395351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernestina Rubio-Mozos & Fernando E. García-Muiña & Laura Fuentes-Moraleda, 2020. "Sustainable Strategic Management Model for Hotel Companies: A Multi-Stakeholder Proposal to “Walk the Talk” toward SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Imperiale, Francesca & Pizzi, Simone & Lippolis, Stella, 2023. "Sustainability reporting and ESG performance in the utilities sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Chris A. Kelsall, 2020. "Ecological Management Accounting—Taking into Account Sustainability, Does Accounting Have Far to Travel?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Shanyong Wang & Hualong Wang & Jing Wang, 2019. "Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 233-243, January.
    5. Lukka, Kari & Becker, Albrecht, 2023. "The future of critical interdisciplinary accounting research: Performative ontology and critical interventionist research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Oliver Laasch & Dirk Moosmayer & Elena Antonacopoulou & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Constellations of Transdisciplinary Practices: A Map and Research Agenda for the Responsible Management Learning Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 735-757, April.
    7. Steve J. Bickley & Alison Macintyre & Benno Torgler, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Sustainable Entrepreneurship," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    8. Olivier E. Malay, 2021. "How to Articulate Beyond GDP and Businesses’ Social and Environmental Indicators?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Kai Hockerts & Lisa Hehenberger & Stefan Schaltegger & Vanina Farber, 2022. "Defining and Conceptualizing Impact Investing: Attractive Nuisance or Catalyst?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 937-950, September.
    10. Sasmoko Sasmoko & Leonardus W. Wasono Mihardjo & Firdaus Alamsjah & Elidjen Elidjen & Arun Kumar Tarofder, 2019. "Investigating the Effect of Digital Technologies, Energy Consumption and Climate Change on Customer s Experience: A Study from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 353-362.
    11. Jose Manuel Diaz‐Sarachaga, 2021. "Shortcomings in reporting contributions towards the sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1299-1312, July.
    12. Stefan Schaltegger & Derk Loorbach & Jacob Hörisch, 2023. "Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 891-902, February.
    13. Tregidga, Helen & Laine, Matias, 2022. "On crisis and emergency: Is it time to rethink long-term environmental accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Roger L. Burritt & Stefan Schaltegger & Katherine Leanne Christ, 2023. "Environmental Management Accounting – Developments Over the Last 20 years from a Framework Perspective," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(4), pages 336-351, December.
    15. Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2022. "The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1222-1234, October.
    16. Olivier E. Malay, 2020. "How to articulate beyond GDP and businesses’ social and environmental indicators?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2020014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    17. Simona Cosma & Andrea Venturelli & Paola Schwizer & Vittorio Boscia, 2020. "Sustainable Development and European Banks: A Non-Financial Disclosure Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:seaccj:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:19-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.