IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rripxx/v26y2019i5p815-838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The poverty of fintech? Psychometrics, credit infrastructures, and the limits of financialization

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Bernards

Abstract

It is increasingly common to claim that innovative financial technologies (‘fintech’) will enable ever-wider access to credit. Previous critical accounts have often linked the development of fintech to processes of financialization. However, these arguments rarely take account of the uneven and highly limited character of ‘financial inclusion’ in practice. Drawing on engagements with science and technology studies and historical materialist political economy, this article advances an approach emphasizing processes of abstraction from productive activities, mediated through particular infrastructures, as core elements of financial accumulation. Seen in this light, psychometrics in particular and alternative credit data more broadly can be seen as flawed efforts to confront three sets of limits—(1) the necessarily reductive character of abstract framings, and the consequent challenges posed by their encounter with complex processes in practice, (2) the ways that systems for credit scoring interact with the infrastructures of existing financial systems, and (3) the difficulty of realizing financial profits in the context of widespread precarious livelihoods. Looking at alternative forms of credit data from this angle offers a way of grasping the truncated and uneven rollout of fintech, and hence of prompting more critical reflections about the limits to processes of financialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Bernards, 2019. "The poverty of fintech? Psychometrics, credit infrastructures, and the limits of financialization," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 815-838, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:815-838
    DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1597753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09692290.2019.1597753
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09692290.2019.1597753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gordon Kuo Siong Tan, 2021. "Democratizing finance with Robinhood: Financial infrastructure, interface design and platform capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(8), pages 1862-1878, November.
    2. Vincent Guermond, 2022. "Contesting the financialisation of remittances: Repertoires of reluctance, refusal and dissent in Ghana and Senegal," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 800-821, June.
    3. Ting Yao & Liangrong Song, 2023. "Fintech and the economic capital of Chinese commercial bank's risk: Based on theory and evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 2109-2123, April.
    4. Michael McCanless, 2023. "Banking on alternative credit scores: Auditing the calculative infrastructure of U.S. consumer lending," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2128-2146, November.
    5. Francis Lwesya & Adam Beni Swebe Mwakalobo, 2023. "Frontiers in microfinance research for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and microfinance institutions (MFIs): a bibliometric analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Rahel Kunz & Julia Maisenbacher & Lekh Nath Paudel, 2022. "Remittances, development and financialisation beyond the Global North," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(4), pages 693-701, June.
    7. Louisa Prause & Sarah Hackfort & Margit Lindgren, 2021. "Digitalization and the third food regime," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 641-655, September.
    8. Nick Bernards, 2019. "Tracing mutations of neoliberal development governance: ‘Fintech’, failure and the politics of marketization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1442-1459, October.
    9. Batiz-Lazo, Bernardo & González-Correa, Ignacio, 2021. "Start-ups, Gender Disparities, and the Fintech Revolution in Latin America," MPRA Paper 109373, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rripxx:v:26:y:2019:i:5:p:815-838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rrip20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.