IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v20y2018i8p1165-1185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs

Author

Listed:
  • Rianne Warsen
  • José Nederhand
  • Erik Hans Klijn
  • Sanne Grotenbreg
  • Joop Koppenjan

Abstract

Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are often regarded as the solution for time and budget overruns in large infrastructural projects, but not all are successful. This raises the question of what really makes PPPs work. Focusing on the role of relational aspects, this article examines the degree to which trust and managerial activities correlate to the perceived performance and cooperation process in PPP projects. A multilevel analysis of survey data from 144 respondents involved in Dutch PPP projects shows that both trust and management correlate significantly to the perceived performance of these projects. Moreover, trust is associated with a good cooperation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rianne Warsen & José Nederhand & Erik Hans Klijn & Sanne Grotenbreg & Joop Koppenjan, 2018. "What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1165-1185, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:8:p:1165-1185
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1428415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428415
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2018.1428415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Reig & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & Marc Esteve, 2021. "Internal and External Transparency in Public-Private Partnerships—The Case of Barcelona’s Water Provision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Arakpogun, Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi & Elsahn, Ziad & Nyuur, Richard B. & Olan, Femi, 2020. "Threading the needle of the digital divide in Africa: The barriers and mitigations of infrastructure sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Verweij, Stefan & Meerkerk, Ingmar van, 2020. "Do public-private partnerships perform better? A comparative analysis of costs for additional work and reasons for contract changes in Dutch transport infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 430-438.
    4. Weixia Lyu & Yanan Zheng & Camila Fonseca & Jerry Zhirong Zhao, 2020. "Public-Private Partnership Transformation and Worker Satisfaction: A Case Study of Sanitation Workers in H-City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Nannan Wang & Xiaoyan Chen & Guobin Wu, 2019. "Public Private Partnerships, a Value for Money Solution for Clean Coal District Heating Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Ophelia Kaneva, 2021. "Public-private partnership in school education in Bulgaria: opportunities and constraints," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 30-40.
    7. Mengyuan Cheng & Guoliang Liu & Yongshun Xu & Ming Chi, 2021. "Enhancing Trust Between PPP Partners: The Role of Contractual Functions and Information Transparency," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    8. Polterovich, Victor, 2021. "Коллаборативные Иерархии [Collaborative Hierarchies]," MPRA Paper 106944, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    10. Yingying Ma & Zhuojun Liu & Shuguang Shen, 2020. "Public-Private or Master-Servant? Examining the Implementation of the Serious Disease Insurance Scheme in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Nate Kauffman & Kristina Hill, 2021. "Climate Change, Adaptation Planning and Institutional Integration: A Literature Review and Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:20:y:2018:i:8:p:1165-1185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.