IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v30y2014i2-3p137-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judicial alignment and criminal justice: evidence from Russian courts

Author

Listed:
  • André Schultz
  • Vladimir Kozlov
  • Alexander Libman

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of informal ties between judges (as represented by regional court chairpersons) and prosecutors on the repressive implementation of criminal justice in Russia in the area of fraud convictions. The authors utilize criminal law statistics of Russian regional courts for 2006–2010 to determine the alignment between chairpersons and prosecutors by measuring the length of their mutual career paths. The informal ties have a strong impact on trial outcome, which, however, changes over time. During periods of high bureaucratic risks and uncertainty, regions with a higher extent of informal ties between judges and prosecutors exhibit more repressive law enforcement. If external risks decrease, informal coalitions seem to increase the independence of the courts, insulating them from bureaucratic pressures and limiting their repressiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • André Schultz & Vladimir Kozlov & Alexander Libman, 2014. "Judicial alignment and criminal justice: evidence from Russian courts," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2-3), pages 137-170, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:30:y:2014:i:2-3:p:137-170
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.856574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2013.856574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2013.856574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Libman & Janis N. Kluge, 2017. "Sticks or Carrots? Comparing Effectiveness of Government Shadow Economy Policies in Russia," Working Papers 364, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    2. Meričková Beáta Mikušová & Bašteková Andrea & Stejskal Jan & Pekár Bernard, 2017. "Economic, Political, Social Factor of Corruption in the Slovak Republic," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 99-120, June.
    3. Janis N. Kluge & Alexander Libman, 2018. "Sticks or Carrots? Comparing Effectiveness of Government Informal Economy Policies in Russia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 60(4), pages 605-637, December.
    4. Travova, Ekaterina, 2023. "Under pressure? Performance evaluation of police officers as an incentive to cheat," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1143-1172.
    5. Libman Alexander & Schultz André & Graeber Thomas, 2016. "Tax Return as a Political Statement," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 377-445, July.
    6. Vladimir Kozlov & Alexander Libman, 2014. "Protection or Repression: The Impact of Judiciary Behavior on SME Development in Russia," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 2(1), pages 14-27, June.
    7. Libman, Alexander & Kozlov, Vladimir, 2012. "Региональные Вариации Гражданского Общества И Судопроизводство В России [Regional Variations of Civil Society and Judiciary in Russia]," MPRA Paper 53564, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:30:y:2014:i:2-3:p:137-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.