IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v41y2007i1p103-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Geography of Knowledge Creation: The Ambivalences between 'Knowledge as an Object' and 'Knowing in Practice'

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Ibert

Abstract

Ibert O. (2007) Towards a geography of knowledge creation: the ambivalences between 'knowledge as an object' and 'knowing in practice', Regional Studies 41, 103-114. This paper juxtaposes two strategies to conceive human expertise and unveils how they mould one's imagination on the spatiality of innovation processes. While the noun 'knowledge' signifies a rationalistic approach and entails a geography that propels an 'argument of agglomeration', the verb 'knowing' denotes a situated-in-practice understanding and inheres an 'argument of place'. The paper discusses in how far an extension of the so far less influential practice view might complement the more traditional agglomeration accounts. The ontological discrepancies between both approaches can be used as theoretical springboards to illuminate more fully the key ambivalences of a geography of knowledge creation. Ibert O. (2007) Vers une geographie de la creation des connaissances: entre 'les connaissances comme objet' et 'connaitre en pratique', Regional Studies 41, 103-114. Cet article cherche a juxtaposer deux strategies visant la conception des competences humaines et a devoiler comment elles faconnent l'imagination quant aux retombees spatiales du processus d'innovation. Alors que le nom 'connaissances' indique une approche rationaliste et necessite une geographie qui met l'accent sur un 'argument en faveur de la notion d'agglomeration', le verbe 'connaitre' signifie une comprehension plus localisee dans la pratique et implique un 'argument en faveur de la notion de lieu'. Cet article discute jusqu'a quel point un elargissement de ce dernier, moins suivi jusqu'ici, pourrait completer les comptes-rendus traditionnels. Les ecarts ontologiques entre les deux approches peuvent se servir de tremplin theorique afin d'eclaircir les attitudes ambivalentes a l'egard d'une geographie de la creation des connaissances. Innovation Creation des connaissances Communautes de pratique Communautes de connaissances Agglomeration Lieu Ibert O. (2007) Auf dem Weg zu einer Geographie der Wissenserzeugung: Die Ambivalenzen zwischen Wissen als Objekt und Wissen als Praxis, Regional Studies 41, 103-114. Der Beitrag vergleicht zwei grundlegende Strategien, Wissen konzeptionell zu fassen, und legt offen, wie diese Strategien unsere Vorstellungen der raumlichen Organisation von Innovationsprozessen beeinflussen. Wahrend das Nomen 'knowledge' fur eine rationalistische Strategie die Wissen als Objekt ansieht steht und eine Geographie des Lernens entwirft, die sich um ein Agglomerationsargument herum gruppiert, wird das Verb 'knowing' in einem Ansatz gebraucht, der Wissen als situiert in Praxis begreift und dessen Geographie durch das Orteargument umrissen werden kann. Der Beitrag diskutiert, inwieweit das bisher weniger einflussreiche Praxisverstandnis von Wissen starker gewichtet und als komplementar zum traditionelleren Agglomerationsargument angesehen werden sollte. Die ontologischen Diskrepanzen zwischen beiden Ansatzen werden als Ausgangspunkte genommen, um wesentliche Ambivalenzen einer Geographie der Wissenserzeugung besser zu verstehen. Innovation Wissenserzeugung Praktikergemeinschaften Epistemische Gemeinschaften Agglomeration Ort Ibert O. (2007) Hacia una geografia de creacion del conocimiento: Ambivalencias entre 'Conocimiento como Objeto' y 'Conocimiento en la Practica, Regional Studies 41, 103-114. En este ensayo se juxtaponen dos estrategias para conceptualizar la experiencia humana y se presenta de que modo estas estrategias moldean nuestra imaginacion sobre la espacialidad de los procesos de innovacion. Si bien el nombre 'conocimiento' significa un planteamiento racionalista e implica una geografia que impulsa un 'argumento de aglomeracion', el verbo 'saber' denota una compresion situada en la practica que forma parte de 'argumento de lugar' Aqui analizamos en que medida una extension de una vision de practica, hasta ahora menos influyente, podria complementar los relatos mas tradicionales de aglomeracion. Las discrepancias ontologicas entre ambos planteamientos pueden utilizarse como trampolines teoricos para dar mayor claridad a las ambivalencias principales de una geografia de creacion del conocimiento. Innovacion Creacion del conocimiento Comunidades de practica Comunidades epistemicas Aglomeracion Lugar

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Ibert, 2007. "Towards a Geography of Knowledge Creation: The Ambivalences between 'Knowledge as an Object' and 'Knowing in Practice'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 103-114.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:41:y:2007:i:1:p:103-114
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400601120346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400601120346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400601120346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grabher, Gernot, 1994. "Lob der Verschwendung: Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung ; ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 122876, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Vallance, 2011. "Relational and Dialectical Spaces of Knowing: Knowledge, Practice, and Work in Economic Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 1098-1117, May.
    2. Vujanović, Nina & Stojčić, Nebojša & Hashi, Iraj, 2021. "FDI spillovers and firm productivity during crisis: Empirical evidence from transition economies," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    3. Robert Huggins & Hiro Izushi & Daniel Prokop & Piers Thompson, 2014. "Regional competitiveness, economic growth and stages of development," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 32(2), pages 255-283.
    4. Hautala, Johanna & Jauhiainen, Jussi S., 2014. "Spatio-temporal processes of knowledge creation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 655-668.
    5. James R Faulconbridge, 2010. "Global Architects: Learning and Innovation through Communities and Constellations of Practice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(12), pages 2842-2858, December.
    6. Dufva, Mikko & Ahlqvist, Toni, 2015. "Knowledge creation dynamics in foresight: A knowledge typology and exploratory method to analyse foresight workshops," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 251-268.
    7. Franz Huber, 2012. "On the Sociospatial Dynamics of Personal Knowledge Networks: Formation, Maintenance, and Knowledge Interactions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(2), pages 356-376, February.
    8. Van Wezemael, Joris E. & Silberberger, Jan M. & Paisiou, Sofia, 2011. "Assessing 'Quality': The unfolding of the 'Good'--Collective decision making in juries of urban design competitions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 167-172, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Hassink, 2001. "Towards Regionally Embedded Innovation Support Systems in South Korea? Case Studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1373-1395, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:41:y:2007:i:1:p:103-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.