IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i3p207-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness To Pay for Environmental Protection in Germany: Coping With the Regional Dimension

Author

Listed:
  • H. Peter Witzke
  • Guido Urfei

Abstract

In this paper a two-step procedure is applied to estimate an indicator of environmental willingness to pay for Germany in considerable regional disaggregation. The first step is the estimation of an ordered probit model based on individual data from a representative survey. In the second step, this model is applied to aggregate NUTS III level data to produce an indicator of regional willingness to pay which is useful for the design of an efficient environmental policy. It turns out that the regional distribution of willingness to pay is dominated by the distribution of income in this data set A partir d'une approcheadeux etapes, cet article cherche a estimer sur le plan regional un indicateur de la volonte de payer la protection de l'environnement en Allemagne. Dans un premier temps, on estime un modele du type probit ordonne sur la base des donnees individuelles provenant d'une enquete representative. Dans un deuxieme temps, le modele se voit appliquer a des donnees globales du type 'NUTS III' afin de produire un indicateur regional de la volonte de payer qui pourrait etre utile pour la mise au point d'une politique efficace en faveur de l'environnement. Il s'avere que la distribution regionale de la volonte de payer s'explique en grande partie par la distribution du revenu que laisse voir cet ensemble de donnees In diesem Aufsatz wird ein zweistufiges Verfahren angewandt, um in tiefer regionaler Differenzierung einen Indikator fur umweltbezogene Zahlungsbereitschaft in Deutschland zu berechnen. Der erste Schritt ist dabei Schatzung eines geordneten Probit-Modells, gestutzt auf Individualdaten aus einer reprasentativen Erhebung. Im zweiten Schritt wird das Modell auf aggregierte Daten auf der 'NUTS III' Ebene angewandt, um einen Indikator der Zahlungsbereitschaft zu erhalten, der fur die Konzeption einer effizienten Umweltpolitik nutzlich ist. Hierbei ergibt sich, dass die regionale Verteilung der Zahlungsbereitschaft in diesem Datensatz entscheidend von der regionalen Einkommensverteilung beeinflusst wird.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Peter Witzke & Guido Urfei, 2001. "Willingness To Pay for Environmental Protection in Germany: Coping With the Regional Dimension," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 207-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:3:p:207-214
    DOI: 10.1080/713693807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/713693807
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/713693807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smith, Kerry & Schwabe, Kurt A. & Mansfield, Carol, 1997. "Does Nature Limit Environmental Federalism?," Working Papers 97-01, Duke University, Department of Economics.
    2. Urfei, Guido, 1999. "Agrarumweltpolitik nach den Prinzipien der Ökonomischen Theorie des Föderalismus: Ein Regionalisierungsansatz zur territorialen Abgrenzung effizienter Politikaktionsräume," RWI Schriften, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, volume 66, number 66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehl, Peter & Plankl, Reiner, 2001. "„Doppelte Politikverflechtung“ als Bestimmungsfaktor der Agrarstruktur- und der Agrarumweltpolitik in der BR Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(03), pages 1-5.
    2. Fletcher, Jerald, 1999. "Watershed Economics: Resource Valuation Issues," Western Region Archives 321705, Western Region - Western Extension Directors Association (WEDA).
    3. Lehmann, Paul & Schleyer, Christian & Wüstemann, Henry & Drechsler, Martin & Hagedorn, Konrad & Wätzold, Frank, 2005. "Promoting the multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry, and rural areas - design and implementation of public policies in Germany," UFZ Discussion Papers 12/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    4. Kirschke, Dieter & Hager, Astrid & Jechlitschka, Kurt & Wegener, Stefan, 2005. "Co-financing Implications for Regional Policy-Making: A Case Study for the Agri-environmental Programme in Saxony-Anhalt," Structural Change and Transition in the Agricultural Sector/ Strukturwandel und Transformation im Agrarbereich (SUTRA) Working Papers 18814, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Urfei, Guido, 2002. "Regionale Verteilung von Schutzgebieten in Deutschland - Eine empirisch gestützte Bewertung der räumlichen Implikationen des Natur- und Landschaftsschutzes per Ordnungsrecht," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-10.
    6. Ring, Irene, 2002. "Ecological public functions and fiscal equalisation at the local level in Germany," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 415-427, September.
    7. Shyam Nath & Yeti Nisha Madhoo, 2021. "Environmental fiscal federalism and atmospheric pollution: A tale of two Indian cities," ASARC Working Papers 2021-01, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
    8. Ring, Irene, 2000. "Intergovernmental fiscal relations and regional sustainability," UFZ Discussion Papers 2/2000, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    9. James Wesley Burnett & Christopher Mothorpe, 2018. "An Economic Assessment of the Southern Atlantic Coastal Region’s Stormwater Management Practices," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(04), pages 1-38, October.
    10. Bruns, B., 2005. "Community-based principles for negotiating water rights: Some conjectures on assumptions and priorities," IWMI Books, Reports H038750, International Water Management Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:3:p:207-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.