IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v38y2026i6p610-641.html

The effects of austerity measures on gender gaps in labour-market outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Dávalos
  • Marko Vladisavljević
  • Jelena Žarković

Abstract

In this paper we estimate the effects that the wage cuts, implemented as part of the fiscal consolidation measures by the Serbian government in late 2014, had on women’s participation in the public sector relative to men, as well as its gender wage gap implications. From the 2014–2015 Serbian Labour Force Survey panel, our findings suggest that the cuts mandated by austerity measures pushed younger and older female workers to unemployment and inactivity, while no such effect was identified for men. We also find evidence of heterogeneous compliance with the wage cut across public subsectors: state-owned enterprises, a subsector dominated by men, exhibited lower compliance with wage cuts compared to the state sector, which is dominated by women. We argue that such heterogeneous compliance prevented austerity measures from delivering its potential equalising effect on the gender wage gap. Our results have important policy implications for future austerity episodes that would arise as a consequence of external shocks affecting the fiscal deficit.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Dávalos & Marko Vladisavljević & Jelena Žarković, 2026. "The effects of austerity measures on gender gaps in labour-market outcomes," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 610-641, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:6:p:610-641
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2026.2666049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2026.2666049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2026.2666049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:6:p:610-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.