IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v29y2017i2p216-231.html

Agricultural support in selected Eastern European and Eurasian countries

Author

Listed:
  • Emil Erjavec
  • Tina Volk
  • Ilona Rac
  • Maja Kožar
  • Marjeta Pintar
  • Miro Rednak

Abstract

The goal of this article is to assess the agricultural policies of eight countries from the former Soviet Union. They hold great potential for agricultural production, and some are relatively unanalysed from the point of view of agricultural policy. The analysis was conducted using qualitative and quantitative evidence. The key challenges facing the region are food security and competitiveness. Policy approaches range from strong interventionism to almost complete liberalisation. Budgetary support is relatively low compared to EU and OECD averages. Transfers to producers dominate (especially input subsidies and on-farm investment support) in all countries, and support to rural development and general services is weak. While prices for crops are near world prices, prices for animal products are fairly high in some countries, indicating high developmental needs. It is possible to discern four broad clusters of countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Emil Erjavec & Tina Volk & Ilona Rac & Maja Kožar & Marjeta Pintar & Miro Rednak, 2017. "Agricultural support in selected Eastern European and Eurasian countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 216-231, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:216-231
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2016.1267968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267968
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2016.1267968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Csaki, Csaba, 2008. "A Joint IAE- EAE Seminar Agricultural Economics and Transition: “What was expected, observed, and learned.”," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 108, pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Regina Neudert & Naiba Allahverdiyeva & Niyaz Mammadov & Alexandre Didebulidze & Volker Beckmann, 2020. "Diversification of Livestock-Keeping Smallholders in Mountainous Rural Regions of Azerbaijan and Georgia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Katarina Đurić & Drago Cvijanović & Radivoj Prodanović & Miroslav Čavlin & Boris Kuzman & Mirjana Lukač Bulatović, 2019. "Serbian Agriculture Policy: Economic Analysis Using the PSE Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mizik, T. & Torok, A. & Jambor, A. & Kovacs, S. & Sipos, L., 2018. "The agricultural competitiveness of the CIS countries in international trade," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277481, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Tamás Mizik & Péter Gál & Áron Török, . "Does Agricultural Trade Competitiveness Matter? The Case of the CIS Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 12(01).
    3. World Bank Group, 2015. "Moldova Public Expenditure Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 28331, The World Bank Group.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:216-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.