IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v45y2018i2p239-259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Port competition with accessibility and congestion: a theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studies

Author

Listed:
  • Yulai Wan
  • Anming Zhang
  • Kevin X Li

Abstract

This review interprets recent studies of the interactions between the competition of gateway seaports and the accessibility of landside transportation links to inland regions. Port competition is treated as part of a rivalry between two transportation chains. This article identifies the main modeling approaches and defines the different types of hinterland access systems described in the literature. A general theoretical framework is then proposed to incorporate those key components. The importance of the proposed framework is revealed by comparing and extending results from the literature. Major assumptions that need further empirical verification are identified and discussed, and related empirical studies are reviewed. Finally, avenues for further research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulai Wan & Anming Zhang & Kevin X Li, 2018. "Port competition with accessibility and congestion: a theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studies," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 239-259, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:239-259
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jung, Paul H. & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2022. "Sea-land interdependence and delimitation of port hinterland-foreland structures in the international transportation system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Natalia Wagner & Izabela Kotowska & Michał Pluciński, 2022. "The Impact of Improving the Quality of the Port’s Infrastructure on the Shippers’ Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Xu, Haonan & Liu, Jiaguo & Qi, Siwen, 2024. "Incentive policy for rail-water multimodal transport: Subsidizing price or constructing dry port?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 219-243.
    4. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Comparative accessibility of Chinese airports and high-speed railway stations: A high-resolution, yet scalable framework based on open data," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Lang, Hao & Czerny, Achim I., 2022. "Airport pricing versus (grandfathered) slots: A generalization," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    6. Randrianarisoa, Laingo M. & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Adaptation to climate change effects and competition between ports: Invest now or later?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 279-322.
    7. Wang, Kun & Zhang, Anming, 2018. "Climate change, natural disasters and adaptation investments: Inter- and intra-port competition and cooperation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 158-189.
    8. Yang, Zhongzhen & Guo, Liquan & Lian, Feng, 2019. "Port integration in a region with multiport gateways in the context of industrial transformation and upgrading of the port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 231-246.
    9. Czerny, Achim I. & Lang, Hao, 2019. "A pricing versus slots game in airport networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 151-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:239-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.