IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v43y2016i2p179-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

US container port resilience in a complex and dynamic world

Author

Listed:
  • Vic Justice
  • Prashant Bhaskar
  • Hilary Pateman
  • Peter Cain
  • Stephen Cahoon

Abstract

The resilience of US container ports is increasingly challenged by disruptive and stressful events such as regulatory change, adverse weather, larger container ship sizes, changing patterns of trade and sea routes, and the still to be quantified effects of enlarging the capabilities and capacity of the Panama Canal. Port sustainability requires the port managers to be resilient in their practices, to maintain existing performance levels and to increase market share when opportunity presents. The primary question that this paper addresses is how US container ports might be affected by adverse events and how they undertake resilience processes when faced with complex problems and uncertain outcomes. The paper gathers insights from literature on complex adaptive systems to discuss how US container ports may adapt to changing circumstances through innovation and the emergent outputs of self-organised agents (components) of their port organisations. The paper suggests that by conceptualising ports as complex adaptive systems, port managers may be able to better understand the complexity of change and organisational dynamics and thus harness the phenomenon of self-organisation towards their strategic intent.

Suggested Citation

  • Vic Justice & Prashant Bhaskar & Hilary Pateman & Peter Cain & Stephen Cahoon, 2016. "US container port resilience in a complex and dynamic world," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 179-191, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:2:p:179-191
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1133937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2015.1133937
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2015.1133937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yao He & Yongchun Yang & Meimei Wang & Xudong Zhang, 2022. "Resilience Analysis of Container Port Shipping Network Structure: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Hamed Hasheminia & Changmin Jiang, 2017. "Strategic trade-off between vessel delay and schedule recovery: an empirical analysis of container liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 458-473, May.
    4. Sungki Kim & Sanggyun Choi & Chanho Kim, 2021. "The Framework for Measuring Port Resilience in Korean Port Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Panahi, Roozbeh & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Pang, Jiayi, 2020. "Climate change adaptation in the port industry: A complex of lingering research gaps and uncertainties," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 10-29.
    6. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Hwan-Seong Kim & Sam-Sang You, 2023. "Data analytics and throughput forecasting in port management systems against disruptions: a case study of Busan Port," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 61-89, March.
    7. Wang, Nanxi & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Assessment of port resilience using Bayesian network: A study of strategies to enhance readiness and response capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Calwin S. Parthibaraj & PL.K. Palaniappan & Angappa Gunasekaran & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2017. "Multi-agent system with iterative auction mechanism for master bay plan problem in marine logistics," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 705-726, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:43:y:2016:i:2:p:179-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.