IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v37y2006i2p131-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing a Proxy for Academic Aptitude

Author

Listed:
  • Wayne A. Grove
  • Tim Wasserman
  • Andrew Grodner

Abstract

Abstract: Although academic ability is the most important explanatory variable in studies of student learning, researchers control for it with a wide array and combinations of proxies. The authors investigated how the proxy choice affects estimates of undergraduate student learning by testing over 150 specifications of a single model, each including a different combination of 11 scholastic aptitude measures—high school grade point average (GPA) and rank and variants of college GPA and Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores. Proxy choices alone cause the magnitude of the estimated learning gains to vary by large and meaningful amounts, with increases ranging from a C+ to less than a B- or to a B. The authors found that collegiate GPA data offer the best proxy for students' individual propensities to learn economics—a result that runs counter to researchers' actual proxy choices. The results suggest that scholars should control for academic aptitude with college grades and either SAT scores or high school GPA or rank.

Suggested Citation

  • Wayne A. Grove & Tim Wasserman & Andrew Grodner, 2006. "Choosing a Proxy for Academic Aptitude," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 131-147, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:131-147
    DOI: 10.3200/JECE.37.2.131-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3200/JECE.37.2.131-147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jensen, Elizabeth J. & Wu, Stephen, 2010. "Early decision and college performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 517-525, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:37:y:2006:i:2:p:131-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.