IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v54y2018i1p18-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Are the Poor More Vulnerable to Bribery in Africa? The Institutional Effects of Services

Author

Listed:
  • Caryn Peiffer
  • Richard Rose

Abstract

Whereas most studies find the poor in Africa to be more vulnerable to bribery because of their lower socio-economic status, this paper proposes institutional differences as an alternative explanation. Because poor people are unable to afford privately provided services, they must use public services. In relying on the state more often, the poor become more vulnerable to bribery. Analyses of Afrobarometer data show that the poor are not more likely to pay bribes for state monopolised services. The poor’s disproportionate vulnerability to bribery for choice services is a function of their greater likelihood to have contact with the state.

Suggested Citation

  • Caryn Peiffer & Richard Rose, 2018. "Why Are the Poor More Vulnerable to Bribery in Africa? The Institutional Effects of Services," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 18-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:54:y:2018:i:1:p:18-29
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1257121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2016.1257121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2016.1257121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rajiv Verma & Saurabh Gupta & Regina Birner, 2023. "What do (future) civil servants think of bribery and corruption? Evidence from India," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    2. Mavisakalyan, Astghik & Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2021. "Can bribery buy health? Evidence from post-communist countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 991-1007.
    3. Olayemi M. Olabiyi, 2022. "The effect of bureaucratic corruption on household food insecurity: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 437-450, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:54:y:2018:i:1:p:18-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.