IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v4y2012i1p134-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beneath the ‘methods debate’ in impact assessment: baring assumptions of a mixed methods impact assessment in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Shaffer

Abstract

The past decade has seen renewed interest in the use of mixed-method approaches across the social sciences and in the field of impact assessment. This body of work has focused on questions of method with insufficient attention devoted to foundational issues. The objective of the present article is to bare the foundational concepts that guided a mixed-method impact assessment of the Hunger Eradication and Poverty Reduction (HEPR) programme in Vietnam. Specifically, it shows how the applied methods used in the HEPR study rested on foundational differences concerning: conceptions of causation and models of causal inferences (probabilities versus mechanisms); analytical focus (outcomes versus processes) and external validity (empirical generalisation versus statistical inference); and constituents of ‘objective’ knowledge (intersubjective observables versus perceptual data).

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Shaffer, 2012. "Beneath the ‘methods debate’ in impact assessment: baring assumptions of a mixed methods impact assessment in Vietnam," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 134-150, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:134-150
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2011.639456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2011.639456
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2011.639456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. White, Howard, 2009. "Some Reflections On Current Debates In Impact Evaluation," 3ie Publications 2009-1, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Shaffer, 2015. "Two Concepts of Causation: Implications for Poverty," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(1), pages 148-166, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howard White, 2009. "Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 271-284.
    2. Cuong NGUYEN, 2016. "An Introduction to Alternative Methods in Program Impact Evaluation," Journal of Economic and Social Thought, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 349-375, September.
    3. Nguyen Viet, Cuong, 2014. "Impact Evaluation of Development Programmes and Policies: Experiences from Viet Nam," MPRA Paper 60919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. World Bank, 2011. "Measuring Changes in Client Lives through Microfinance : Contributions of Different Approaches," World Bank Publications - Reports 9452, The World Bank Group.
    5. Alison Buttenheim, 2010. "Impact evaluation in the post-disaster setting: a case study of the 2005 Pakistan earthquake," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 197-227.
    6. Sunderlin, William D. & de Sassi, Claudio & Sills, Erin O. & Duchelle, Amy E. & Larson, Anne M. & Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja & Awono, Abdon & Kweka, Demetrius Leo & Huynh, Thu Ba, 2018. "Creating an appropriate tenure foundation for REDD+: The record to date and prospects for the future," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 376-392.
    7. Gala D�az Langou & Vanesa Weyrauch, 2013. "Sound expectations: from impact evaluations to policy change," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 269-304, September.
    8. Nguyen Viet, Cuong, 2014. "Impact Evaluation of Development Programmes and Policies: Experiences from Viet Nam," MPRA Paper 60919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Rob Tulder & M. May Seitanidi & Andrew Crane & Stephen Brammer, 2016. "Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Глущенко К. П., 2012. "Оценка эффективности транспортных проектов: опыт и проблемы (часть 2). Transport project appraisal: experience and problems (part 2)," Мир экономики и управления // Вестник НГУ. Cерия: Cоциально-экономические науки, Socionet;Новосибирский государственный университет, vol. 12(1), pages 40-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:134-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.