IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v43y2016i9p1722-1737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local influence diagnostics for incomplete overdispersed longitudinal counts

Author

Listed:
  • Trias Wahyuni Rakhmawati
  • Geert Molenberghs
  • Geert Verbeke
  • Christel Faes

Abstract

We develop local influence diagnostics to detect influential subjects when generalized linear mixed models are fitted to incomplete longitudinal overdispersed count data. The focus is on the influence stemming from the dropout model specification. In particular, the effect of small perturbations around an MAR specification are examined. The method is applied to data from a longitudinal clinical trial in epileptic patients. The effect on models allowing for overdispersion is contrasted with that on models that do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Trias Wahyuni Rakhmawati & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke & Christel Faes, 2016. "Local influence diagnostics for incomplete overdispersed longitudinal counts," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1722-1737, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:9:p:1722-1737
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1117594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2015.1117594
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2015.1117594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geert Molenberghs & Caroline Beunckens & Cristina Sotto & Michael G. Kenward, 2008. "Every missingness not at random model has a missingness at random counterpart with equal fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 371-388, April.
    2. Verbeke, Geert & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 1997. "The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 541-556, February.
    3. Ivy Jansen & Geert Molenberghs & Marc Aerts & Herbert Thijs & Kristel Van Steen, 2003. "A Local Influence Approach Applied to Binary Data from a Psychiatric Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 410-419, June.
    4. Geert Verbeke & Geert Molenberghs & Herbert Thijs & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Michael G. Kenward, 2001. "Sensitivity Analysis for Nonrandom Dropout: A Local Influence Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 7-14, March.
    5. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert & Thijs, Herbert & Lesaffre, Emmanuel & Kenward, Michael G., 2001. "Influence analysis to assess sensitivity of the dropout process," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 93-113, July.
    6. Xiaoyan Shi & Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2009. "Local Influence for Generalized Linear Models with Missing Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1164-1174, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Eftekhari Mahabadi & M. Ganjali, 2012. "An index of local sensitivity to non-ignorability for parametric survival models with potential non-random missing covariate: an application to the SEER cancer registry data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 2327-2348, July.
    2. Ivy Jansen & Geert Molenberghs, 2008. "A flexible marginal modelling strategy for non‐monotone missing data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 347-373, April.
    3. O'Hara Hines, R.J. & Hines, W.G.S., 2007. "Covariance miss-specification and the local influence approach in sensitivity analyses of longitudinal data with drop-outs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5537-5546, August.
    4. Xie, Hui, 2012. "Analyzing longitudinal clinical trial data with nonignorable missingness and unknown missingness reasons," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1287-1300.
    5. Caroline Beunckens & Cristina Sotto & Geert Molenberghs & Geert Verbeke, 2009. "A multifaceted sensitivity analysis of the Slovenian public opinion survey data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(2), pages 171-196, May.
    6. Baojiang Chen & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2011. "Doubly Robust Estimates for Binary Longitudinal Data Analysis with Missing Response and Missing Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 830-842, September.
    7. Ivy Jansen & Ann Van den Troost & Geert Molenberghs & Ad A. Vermulst & Jan R. M. Gerris, 2006. "Modeling Partially Incomplete Marital Satisfaction Data," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 35(1), pages 113-136, August.
    8. Richard M. Golden & Steven S. Henley & Halbert White & T. Michael Kashner, 2019. "Consequences of Model Misspecification for Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Missing Data," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-27, September.
    9. Betsy J. Feldman & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2012. "Modeling Achievement Trajectories When Attrition Is Informative," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(6), pages 703-736, December.
    10. Xiaoyan Shi & Hongtu Zhu & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2009. "Local Influence for Generalized Linear Models with Missing Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1164-1174, December.
    11. Niansheng Tang & Sy-Miin Chow & Joseph G. Ibrahim & Hongtu Zhu, 2017. "Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Dynamic Factor Analysis Model with Nonparametric Prior and Possible Nonignorable Missingness," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 875-903, December.
    12. Heng Chen & Daniel F. Heitjan, 2022. "Analysis of local sensitivity to nonignorability with missing outcomes and predictors," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1342-1352, December.
    13. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    14. Peng Zhang & Peter X.-K. Song & Annie Qu & Tom Greene, 2008. "Efficient Estimation for Patient-Specific Rates of Disease Progression Using Nonnormal Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 29-38, March.
    15. Sinha, Sanjoy K. & Kaushal, Amit & Xiao, Wenzhong, 2014. "Inference for longitudinal data with nonignorable nonmonotone missing responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-91.
    16. Brenden Bishop & Minjeong Jeon, 2016. "Book Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1164-1167, December.
    17. Yu, Q. & Tang, W. & Ma, Y. & Gamble, S.A. & Tu, X.M., 2008. "Comparing multiple sensitivities and specificities with different diagnostic criteria: Applications to sexual abuse and sexual health research," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 27-37, September.
    18. Ye, Rendao & Wang, Tonghui & Gupta, Arjun K., 2014. "Distribution of matrix quadratic forms under skew-normal settings," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 229-239.
    19. Huang, Xianzheng, 2011. "Detecting random-effects model misspecification via coarsened data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 703-714, January.
    20. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:9:p:1722-1737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.